Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 13;2016(4):CD011131. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011131.pub2

Takmaz 2009.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: prospective, randomised, double‐blind, controlled trial
Intention‐to‐treat: Not stated
Sample size calculation: "The calculated sample size for a clinical difference of 4.5 hours between the groups, at an alpha error of 5% and a beta error of 90%, was 20 per group"
Setting: single centre. Turkey
Follow up: 24 hours
Participants N = 40 (65% male)
Interventions Group 1: (n = 20) extraoral infraorbital nerve block with 1.5 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% with adrenaline
Group 2: (n = 20) "sham" block with saline solution
Outcomes
  • Pain measured by the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Scale

  • Heart rate, blood pressure, and respiratory rate

  • Time to first analgesic requirement

  • Rescue analgesia requirement

  • Parent satisfaction

  • Adverse effect

Notes Jadad score: 5
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer‐generated random number table
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk "In all patients, the nerve block was performed by the anaesthetist who was unaware of the content of the solution"
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk "Postoperative assessment was performed by an investigator blinded to the patient’s group"
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk No losses
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk The report of the study was free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting
Other bias High risk Size: sample size less than 50 per treatment arm