Takmaz 2009.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Study design: prospective, randomised, double‐blind, controlled trial Intention‐to‐treat: Not stated Sample size calculation: "The calculated sample size for a clinical difference of 4.5 hours between the groups, at an alpha error of 5% and a beta error of 90%, was 20 per group" Setting: single centre. Turkey Follow up: 24 hours |
|
Participants | N = 40 (65% male) | |
Interventions | Group 1: (n = 20) extraoral infraorbital nerve block with 1.5 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% with adrenaline Group 2: (n = 20) "sham" block with saline solution |
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes | Jadad score: 5 | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computer‐generated random number table |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "In all patients, the nerve block was performed by the anaesthetist who was unaware of the content of the solution" |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "Postoperative assessment was performed by an investigator blinded to the patient’s group" |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No losses |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | The report of the study was free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting |
Other bias | High risk | Size: sample size less than 50 per treatment arm |