Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 13;2018(2):CD009812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009812.pub2

Comparison 2. Affect.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Positive affect 6 498 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.88 [0.43, 1.32]
1.1 Personally tailored activities vs. usual care 4 282 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 1.30 [0.77, 1.84]
1.2 Personally tailored activities vs. active control 3 216 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.36 [0.09, 0.63]
2 Positive affect‐excluding recalculated study results 5 318 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.76 [0.38, 1.13]
3 Negative affect 6 632 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.02 [‐0.19, 0.14]
3.1 Personally tailored activities vs. usual care 4 416 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.01 [‐0.19, 0.22]
3.2 Personally tailored activities vs. active control 3 216 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.09 [‐0.36, 0.18]
4 Negative affect‐excluding recalculated study results 5 452 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.03 [‐0.22, 0.16]
5 Mood 3 247 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.02 [‐0.27, 0.23]