Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 1;2018(2):CD004879. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004879.pub5

ab Belshe 1992.

Methods RCT of safety vaccine, double‐blind
 0.5 mL of trivalent vaccine administered intranasally 
 Children observed in own homes for 11 days by nursing staff
 Daily sampling ‐ nasopharyngeal swabbing for isolation of influenza virus
 Serum for antibody determination obtained on days 0 and 28 to 31.
Participants Healthy children age 6 months to 13 years
Interventions Live, trivalent vaccine, recombinant containing A/Kawasaki/9/86 (H1N1) CR125 + A/Korea/1/82 CR59 + B/Texas/1/84 CRB‐87
 A/Kawasaki/9/86 and A/Korea/1/82 derived from cold‐adapted A/Ann/Arbor/6/60 parent virus.
 B/Texas/1/84 derived from cold‐adapted B/Ann Arbor/1/66 parent virus.
Outcomes Adverse reactions up to 11 days after vaccination
 Fever: rectal temperature > 38.3 °C (infants and young children); oral temperature > 37.8 °C (older children)
 Upper respiratory illness: rhinorrhoea on 2 consecutive days; lower respiratory illness; wheeze or pneumonia; OM
 Viral shedding (data not extracted)
 Serologic response to vaccine (data not extracted)
Funding Source Government
Notes Safety data presented separately for seronegative and seropositive responders, but were combined for extraction. Was significantly (P < 0.5) higher upper respiratory illness in seronegative individuals than in seropositive individuals.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk Not used
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Double‐blinding
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk  
Summary assessments High risk Lack of allocation concealment; plausible bias that seriously weakens confidence in the results