Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 1;2018(2):CD004879. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004879.pub5

aa Hoberman 2003b.

Methods See aa Hoberman 2003a
Participants  
Interventions  
Outcomes  
Funding Source  
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Random number, computer‐generated list, block randomisation (block of 9)
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk "Randomisation lists were kept in locked files not accessible to blinded personnel"
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Double‐blinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Proportion of missing outcomes compared with observed event risk not enough to have a clinically relevant impact on the intervention effect estimate.
Summary assessments Low risk