Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 1;2018(2):CD004879. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004879.pub5

ab Swierkosz 1994.

Methods Randomised, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled trial to assess safety of adding a third dose of a live attenuated, cold‐recombinant, trivalent influenza vaccine
Participants 22 healthy infants and children aged 2 to 22 months were recruited. 17 were seronegative to all 3 haemagglutinin types, while 2 were seronegative to H3 and B and 2 were seronegative to H1 and B.
Interventions Children were randomised to receive 3 doses of 0.5 mL vaccine or placebo intranasally in a double‐blinded fashion. 17 children received vaccine and 5 received placebo. Vaccine was administered at day 0, day 60, and day 120. Vaccine contained 3 strains: A/Kawasaki/9/86 (H1N1), A/Los Angeles/2/87 (H3N2), and B/Yamagata/16/88. The vaccine lots contained 108.0, 108.0, and 107.6 TCID50/mL H1N1, H3N2, and B. 106 TCID50 of each strain was present in 0.5 mL of trivalent vaccine.
Outcomes Serological
 "HAI titres against H1, H3, B and all types (H1, H3 and B) after first dose at day 0, second dose at day 60 and third dose at day 120
 ELISA response to H1, H3, B and to all types (H1, H3 and B) after dose first dose at day 0, after second dose at day 60 and third dose at day 120"
Effectiveness
 N/A
Safety
 Adverse reactions were defined as fever (rectal temperature > 38.3 °C, or > 37.2 °C axillary); cough (2 or more episodes during examination on 2 consecutive days); otitis media (red immovable ear drum diagnosed by pneumotoscopy); and lower respiratory tract infection as indicated by wheezing (sustained musical sound during expiration) or pneumonia (a new alveolar consolidation seen radiographically). Clinical observations were recorded daily for 11 days.
Funding Source Government
Notes The authors conclude that trivalent, cold‐adapted intranasal influenza vaccine is safe and immunogenic when administered in a 3‐dose regimen. A tiny schedule‐ranging trial. Only 4 children were aged less than 6 months.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not described
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not described
Summary assessments Unclear risk Insufficient information to assess study design