ca Ortqvist 2011.
Methods | Prospective cohort study carried out on Stockholm County inhabitants aged at least 6 months between week 44 and 52 in order to assess effectiveness of pandemic monovalent flu vaccine H1N1 (Pandemrix, GSK) in preventing laboratory‐confirmed H1N1 flu cases. Estimates were calculated by linking data from different databases: Sminet (for laboratory‐confirmed H1N1 flu cases), Vaccinera (on which data of vaccinated participants has been reported), Common Health‐Care Registers for Stockholm County Council (GVR, for detection of hospital admission cases due to influenza H1N1), Statistic Sweden (for demographical data). | |
Participants | Inhabitants of Stockholm County (2,019,183, out of which 449,971 were aged under 19 years) | |
Interventions |
Immunisation campaign started in week 42. Data about vaccination are recorded in the Vaccinera database, where date of vaccination, batch number of the vaccine, the person’s unique identification number, medical risk group of vaccinated are reported. A flu case was considered vaccinated if diagnosis/hospital admittance occurred more than 14 days after administration of the first vaccine dose. 25 cases of confirmed H1N1 flu cases were observed between weeks 44 and 52 among participants who had received 1 or 2 vaccine doses at least 14 days before diagnosis or hospitalisation. Out of them, 11 (10) were aged between 6 months and 12 years. |
|
Outcomes | Laboratory Not assessed Effectiveness Cases of laboratory‐confirmed H1N1 flu cases notified to the Institute for Infectious Diseases Control and available in the Sminet database occurred between week 42 and 52 of 2009. Incidence rate ratios for a given week were calculated comparing the rate of people who developed influenza > 14 days after being vaccinated out of the cumulated number of people who had been vaccinated up until 2 weeks before with the rate of people with an influenza diagnosis out of all non‐vaccinated people, excluding people who had had a previous influenza diagnosis. Safety Not assessed | |
Funding Source | Government: funding was provided by the County Council of Stockholm and by the Department of Communicable Diseases Control and Prevention, Stockholm County. Authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. |
|
Notes | Authors attempted to identify possible risk factors associated with vaccine failure in the study population, analysing incidence of several chronic conditions in cases (total cases of vaccine failures, n = 25) and in vaccinated controls (matched for age and vaccination date) using a case‐control design. For both chronic renal or hepatic disease and immunocompromised condition, a significant association was found (whole populations). As authors self note in the Discussion, “the sampling for the sampling for an influenza diagnosis was not made systematically but in routine medical care”. The authors conclude that “monovalent AS03‐adjuvanted influenza A(H1N1)v vaccine was very effective in preventing the pandemic influenza in Stockholm County”. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
PCS/RCS‐Selection Exposed cohort | Unclear risk | Voluntary vaccinee |
PCS/RCS‐Selection Non Exposed cohort | Unclear risk | Refuse the vaccination |
PCS/RCS‐Comparability | High risk | Insufficient description |
PCS/RCS‐Assessment of Oucome | Low risk | Secure record |
Summary assessments | High risk | Insufficient description as to how exposed and not exposed were selected ‐ possible bias by indication |