Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 5;2016(1):CD001800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub3

Maddison 2014.

Methods Study design: Single blind multicentre RCT (2 sites)
Country: New Zealand
Dates patients recruited: 2010 to 2012
Maximum follow up: 24 weeks
Participants Inclusion criteria: Aged 18 years or more, with a diagnosis of IHD, defined as angina, myocardial infarction, revascularisation, including angioplasty, stent or coronary artery bypass graft within the previous 3 to 24 months. All participants were clinically stable as outpatients, able to perform exercise, able to understand and write English, and had access to the Internet (e.g. at home, work, library or through friends or relatives).
Exclusion criteria: Patients were excluded if they had been admitted to hospital with heart disease within the previous 6 weeks; had terminal cancer, or had significant exercise limitations other than IHD
N Randomised: total: 171; intervention: 85; comparator: 86
Diagnosis (% of pts):
IHD: 100%
MI: 74%
 Angina: 50%
Age (mean ±SD): total: 60.2 ± 9.3; intervention: 61.4 ± 8.9; comparator: 59.0 ± 9.5
Percentage male: total: 81%; intervention: 81%; comparator: 81%
Ethnicity:
NZ Maori: total: 8%; intervention: 7%; comparator: 8%
 Pacific: total: 6%; intervention: 6%; comparator: 6%
 Asian: total: 10%; intervention: 9%; comparator: 10%
NZ European/other: total: 76%; intervention: 78%; comparator: 76%
Interventions Intervention: The HEART programme is a personalised, automated package of text messages via mobile phones aimed at increasing exercise behaviour over 24 weeks. Patients received six messages per week for the first 12 weeks, five messages per week for 6 weeks, and then four messages per week for the remaining 6 weeks.
Components: exercise.
Setting: home.
Aerobic exercise:
Modality: moderate to vigorous aerobic‐based exercise e.g. walking and household chores.
Length of session: minimum of 30 minutes.
Frequency: at least 5 days/week.
Intensity: NR
Resistance training included? No.
Total duration: 24 weeks.
Co‐interventions: focus on altering the key mediators of behaviour change, including self‐efficacy, social support and motivation.
Comparator: usual care, with encouragement to be physically active and attend a cardiac club.
Co‐interventions: All participants were free to participate in any other CR service or support that they wished to use e.g. participating in community‐based CR education sessions on modifying CVD risk factors and psychological support, as well as encouragement to be physically active.
Outcomes HRQL, costs.
Source of funding Health Research Council of New Zealand and the Heart Foundation. Dr Maddison was supported by a Heart Foundation Research Fellowship and a Health Research Council Sir Charles Hercus Research Fellowship.
Conflicts of interest None declared.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "....were randomly allocated..... by means of a central computerized service. Randomization was conducted using the minimization method, stratifying by sex (male and female), ethnicity (Maori – indigenous – and non‐Maori), and exercise history"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk "Allocation concealment was maintained up to the point of randomization"
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk "This was a single‐blind trial, where outcome assessors were blinded to treatment allocation"
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Loss to follow‐up was well reported and was similar in both groups. 10/85 [12%] and 8/86 [9%] were lost to follow up from the Intervention and control groups.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes described in the methods section are reported in results.
Groups balanced at baseline Low risk "Treatment groups were well balanced at baseline."
Intention‐to‐treat analysis conducted Low risk "Treatment evaluations were performed on the principle of intention to treat (ITT), using data collected from all randomized participants."
Groups received same treatment (apart from the intervention) Low risk "All participants were free to participate in any other CR service or support that they wished to use......In addition, participants in the intervention group received the HEART programme."