Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 1;2018(2):CD001269. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001269.pub6

aa Keitel 1997a.

Methods Randomised controlled trial, double‐blind, conducted in the USA during the 1985 to 1986 influenza season. Follow‐up lasted the whole epidemic period. The influenza period was defined by viral surveillance. Volunteers were randomly allocated to receive vaccine or placebo using a table of random numbers according to prior vaccination experience. Specimens for culture and acute‐convalescent blood specimens were obtained from ill people. At spring time, volunteers were asked to record any illness that occurred during the epidemic period, and blood specimens were collected.
Participants 830 healthy employees working in the Texas Medical Center in Houston, Texas, or in surrounding industrial companies: 577 treated and 253 placebo. Age of participants was 30 to 60.
Interventions Trivalent, killed, whole, intramuscularly administered vaccine. Schedule and dose were: single dose; 15 µg of haemagglutinin of each influenza strain. Vaccine composition was: A/Philippines/2/82 (H3N2), A/Chile/1/83 (H1N1), and B/USSR/100/83. Placebo was sterile saline for injection. Vaccine was recommended but did not match the circulating strain.
Outcomes ILI, influenza. Illnesses were classified as "any", "flu‐like" (lower respiratory or systemic illness, or both), and "febrile" (oral temperature of 37.8 °C or higher). Laboratory confirmation was based on culture and/or 4‐fold or greater rise in antibody titre occurring between postvaccination (pre‐epidemic), acute, convalescent and/or spring (postepidemic) sera. Surveillance was active.
Notes Influenza‐like illness and influenza cases were detected in 3 groups: first vaccinated, multivaccinated, and placebo. Febrile illnesses were included in the analysis; the first 2 groups' cases were combined. Circulating strains were B/Ann Arbor/1/86, A/Mississippi/1/85.
 Efficacy data only were extracted.
Government funded
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk No description
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Unclear
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No description
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No description
Summary assessment Unclear risk No description