Ballotta 2003.
Methods | Site: Femoral to AK popliteal Study design: RCT Method of randomisation: concealed randomisation using computer generated randomisation envelopes Blinding: unblinded, intention to treat Exclusions post randomisation: none Losses to follow up: none |
|
Participants | Country: Italy Setting: hospital No. of participants: 51 (102 limbs; 51 PTFE, 51 reversed vein) Age (mean): 62 yrs Sex: 33 males, 18 females Inclusion criteria: severe claudication, SFA occlusion with one to three runoff vessels Exclusion criteria: untreated inflow disease of ipsilateral pelvic arteries (more than 50% stenosis or occlusion); previous bypass procedure or stent in target SFA; multiple lesions exceeding 10 cm; acute critical limb ischaemia; an untreated ipsilateral iliac artery stenosis; known intolerance to study medications or contrast agents |
|
Interventions | 8 mm PTFE and reversed vein graft Oral warfarin from one day pre‐op and continued for 6 months; 325 mg aspirin afterwards |
|
Outcomes | Primary assisted patency as remedial surgery for late bypass stenosis was not considered a primary failure 5‐year data |
|
Notes | Compliance with medication not checked | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "Concealed randomisation using computer generated randomisation envelopes." |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Envelopes sealed as above |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Operative blinding impossible in this type of trial |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Outcome assessors and patients not obviously blinded |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No patients lost to long term follow up (mean 59 months) |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All stated outcomes reported |
Other bias | Low risk | No other obvious bias |