Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 11;2018(2):CD001487. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001487.pub3

Devine 2004.

Methods Site: Femoral to AK and BK popliteal
Study design: RCT
Method of randomisation: concealed randomisation using computer generated randomisation envelopes
Blinding: unblinded, intention to treat
Exclusions post randomisation: none
Losses to follow up: none
Participants Country: UK
Setting: hospital
No. of participants: 209 (AK: 88 PTFE, 91 HBD; BK: 15 PTFE, 15 HBD)
Age (mean): 63 yrs
Sex: 142 males, 67 females
Inclusion criteria: severe claudication, SFA occlusion with one to three runoff vessels
Exclusion criteria: emergency surgery for trauma, acute thrombosis, embolism, or popliteal artery thrombosis
 Symptoms not sufficiently severe to disrupt lifestyle or ABI > 0.8 at rest (unless aneurysm), the diagnosis or treatment for malignancy within 12 months including all cases with residual malignancy being followed up or observed, hospital inpatient treatment for cardiac failure in the previous 6 months, where adequate follow‐up would be impossible to arrange because the patient lived or was moving to an area where independent follow up could not be arranged
Interventions HBD or PTFE (diameter at discretion of operating surgeon)
Anticoagulation not stated
Outcomes Primary patency
Notes Anticoagulation not stated
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "Randomization, stratified for AK or BK and by surgeon, was performed for eligible patients, using a dedicated computer program."
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "Sealed randomization envelopes (1 for AK, 1 for BK) were delivered to the vascular surgeon before surgery."
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Operative blinding impossible in this type of trial
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Outcome assessors and patients not obviously blinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No losses, but numbers at risk not given for below knee outcomes so attrition not clear for this outcome
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All stated outcomes reported
Other bias Unclear risk Anticoagulation protocol not stated