Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Dec 12;102(5):842–849. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.12.009

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Classification of prognostic tools according to their use of combinations of aleatory and epistemic uncertainty using our framework.

From 222 tools, 200 of which provided only quantitative descriptions (some tools included more than 1 different type of quantitative description), 22 provided only qualitative descriptions, and 7 included only combined qualitative and quantitative descriptions.