Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 8.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Commun (Camb). 2019 Apr 4;55(36):5195–5206. doi: 10.1039/c9cc01460h

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Optimized geometries of 1·Br and 2·Br. The 2,4-dinitro substituted triethylbenzene receptor 1 binds its guest via aryl CH hydrogen bonds versus the weak–σ binding mode depicted in the 3,5-dinitro substituted receptor 2. Figure adapted with permission of the American Chemical Society from ref. 26. Copyright 2008.