Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 1;2018(2):CD008983. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008983.pub3

Machado 2005.

Methods Retrospective case‐control study (confirmed influenza versus no influenza)
 Location and setting: Brazil
Participants HSCT recipients (CML, acute leukaemia, severe aplastic anaemia, NHL, MM, other)
43 participants eligible to receive influenza vaccination: 19 vaccinated 24 unvaccinated
Mean age not reported
Interventions Influenza vaccination, obtained from review of participants' charts
Outcomes
  1. Confirmed influenza by direct immunofluorescence assay

  2. Adverse events

Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk Non‐random
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk Non‐random
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Mortality ‐ no record
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk The only outcome reported was documented influenza
Other bias High risk No control for cancer stage and functional capacity, funding not mentioned, no sample size calculation
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Non‐blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Non‐blinded