Machado 2005.
Methods | Retrospective case‐control study (confirmed influenza versus no influenza) Location and setting: Brazil | |
Participants | HSCT recipients (CML, acute leukaemia, severe aplastic anaemia, NHL, MM, other) 43 participants eligible to receive influenza vaccination: 19 vaccinated 24 unvaccinated Mean age not reported |
|
Interventions | Influenza vaccination, obtained from review of participants' charts | |
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | High risk | Non‐random |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | Non‐random |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Mortality ‐ no record |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | The only outcome reported was documented influenza |
Other bias | High risk | No control for cancer stage and functional capacity, funding not mentioned, no sample size calculation |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Non‐blinded |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Non‐blinded |