Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 10;2018(1):CD001905. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001905.pub3

Talukdar 2009.

Methods Prospective randomised trial in a single centre
Participants 120 children of both sexes aged 0 ‐ 12 years (mean age 3.2 years) presenting with an episode of convulsion, irrespective of cause and duration.
 Those patients with myoclonic, absence and atonic seizures were excluded
Interventions Buccal midazolam versus intravenous diazepam
Outcomes Cessation of all motor activity within or by 5 minutes of administration of the drug
 Treatment initiation time (time from noting seizure to drug administration), drug effect time (time from drug administration to effect) and total controlling time, a combination of the previous two
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "randomisation was done using the random number table"
Comment: probably done
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to assess this
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Study unblinded, but blinding would not have been possible due to the different routes of administration of the 2 study drugs; this is not likely to have affected outcome
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk All participants were included in the analysis
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All prespecified outcomes were reported in the Results section
Other bias Low risk None identified

IV: intravenous
 PICU: paediatric intensive care unit
 RCT: randomised controlled trial