Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 2;2017(11):CD001511. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001511.pub3
Methods Randomised controlled trial
Country: France, 1979‐1982
Analyses were performed according to intention‐to‐treat method.
Sample size calculation was not reported.
Participants Demographic characteristics
Age: prednisolone group: average 41 years old (26 to 68); control group: average 49 years old (30 to 70)
Sex: 16 men and 8 women in the treatment group, and 11 men and 10 women in the control group
Inclusion criteria and degree of severity Not stated clearly, but the average level of bilirubin was ≥ 147 + 30.78 mmol/L
Alcohol consumption: 155 g + 46 g per day in men; 140 g + 32 g per day in women
Exclusion criteria 48 patients were excluded due to infections (45 patients), diabetes (2 patients), and tuberculosis (1 patient).
Randomisation procedure
Random number table
Number of participants randomised
n = 45
Prednisolone group: n = 24
Control group: n = 21
Interventions Experimental group: oral prednisolone
Dose: 40 mg/d
Control group: no intervention
Additional interventions to the trial groups: 1500 calories and 50 g of protein/d. Encephalopathy was treated with lactulose and neomycin. In case of infection, participants were treated with antibiotics.
Duration of treatment: 1 month
Duration of follow‐up: 3 months after randomisation
Outcomes The trial outcomes were:
  • Mortality

  • Liver histology

  • Adverse events

Notes Letter sent to authors in March 2000. No answer received
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk "By random number table"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes High risk Not blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk No information
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk No dropouts
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All‐cause mortality, serious adverse events, and liver‐related mortality were reported
For‐profit bias Unclear risk Not reported
Other bias Low risk None suspected