Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 16;2018(1):CD011450. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011450.pub2

Schoepfer 2009.

Methods 115 UC patients requiring colonoscopy were prospectively enrolled
The clinical and endoscopic portions of the Rachmilewitz Endoscopic Score were assessed
Fecal and blood samples were obtained after colonoscopy
4 trained gastroenterologists graded the endoscopic findings
Data 19 patients underwent 2 colonoscopies, therefore there were 134 colonoscopies performed
Comparisons Rachmilewitz Score (clinical)
Fecal calprotectin
C‐reactive protein
Blood leukocytes
Outcomes Criterion validity, construct validity (see Table 4 and Table 5)
Notes Endoscopic scoring index assessed: Rachmilewitz Endoscopic Score
Risk of bias
Item Authors' judgement Description
Blinding? Yes All gastroenterologists performing the colonoscopies were unaware of clinical and biomarker data to avoid bias
The clinical score was performed by a different physician than the one that performed the colonoscopy
Independent Observation? Unclear Not adequately described (not necessary for construct and criterion validation)