Schoepfer 2009.
| Methods | 115 UC patients requiring colonoscopy were prospectively enrolled The clinical and endoscopic portions of the Rachmilewitz Endoscopic Score were assessed Fecal and blood samples were obtained after colonoscopy 4 trained gastroenterologists graded the endoscopic findings |
|
| Data | 19 patients underwent 2 colonoscopies, therefore there were 134 colonoscopies performed | |
| Comparisons | Rachmilewitz Score (clinical) Fecal calprotectin C‐reactive protein Blood leukocytes |
|
| Outcomes | Criterion validity, construct validity (see Table 4 and Table 5) | |
| Notes | Endoscopic scoring index assessed: Rachmilewitz Endoscopic Score | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Item | Authors' judgement | Description |
| Blinding? | Yes | All gastroenterologists performing the colonoscopies were unaware of clinical and biomarker data to avoid bias The clinical score was performed by a different physician than the one that performed the colonoscopy |
| Independent Observation? | Unclear | Not adequately described (not necessary for construct and criterion validation) |