Skip to main content
PMC home page
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2019 Apr 24;30(3):54–62. doi: 10.1007/s00335-019-09800-9

The guanine nucleotide exchange factor, Spata13, influences social behaviour and nocturnal activity

Nora Bourbia 1,2, Paige Chandler 1, Gemma Codner 1, Gareth Banks 1, Patrick M Nolan 1,✉
PMCID: PMC6491400  PMID: 31020388

Abstract

Spermatogenesis-associated protein 13 (Spata13) is a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) enriched in discrete brain regions in the adult, with pronounced expression in the extended central amygdala (CeA). Loss of Spata13, also known as the adenomatous polyposis coli exchange factor Asef2, has no identifiable phenotype although it has been shown to reduce the number and size of intestinal tumours in Apc (Min/+) mice. Nevertheless, its brain-related functions have not been investigated. To pursue this, we have generated a Spata13 knockout mouse line using CRISPR-mediated deletion of an exon containing the GTPase domain that is common to multiple isoforms. Homozygous mutants were viable and appeared normal. We subjected both male and female cohorts to a comprehensive battery of behavioural tests designed to investigate particular CeA-related functions. Here, we show that Spata13 modulates social behaviour with homozygous mutants being subordinate to wildtype controls. Furthermore, female homozygotes show increased activity in home cages during the dark phase of the light–dark cycle. In summary, Spata13 modulates social hierarchy in both male and female mice in addition to affecting voluntary activity in females.

Introduction

Spermatogenesis-associated protein 13 (Spata13, ID 219140) codes for an eponymous protein acting as a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) for RhoA, Rac1 and Cdc42 GTPases (Kawasaki et al. 2007; Bristow et al. 2009). Notably Spata13 is expressed in discrete loci within the brain (Lein et al. 2007) with particular enrichment in the central extended amygdala (Becker et al. 2008). Functionally, the central extended amygdala and the central amygdala have been well characterised. The regions have been shown to play important roles in anxiety-like, fear and threat (Shackman and Fox 2016; Fox and Shackman 2017), pain (Bourbia et al. 2010), feeding, reward and addiction (Koob 1999; Waraczynski 2006; Douglass et al. 2017), voluntary activity (Izumo et al. 2012) and aggressive behaviours (Haller 2018).

At the cellular level, Spata13 has been shown to play a role in cell migration (Sagara et al. 2009; Evans et al. 2014) and glutamatergic dendritic spine formation (Evans et al. 2015). A previous study using a knock-out (KO) mouse for Spata13 has established its importance in the development of adenomas (Kawasaki et al. 2009). However the behavioural function of Spata13 is, as yet, unknown. A missense variant in SPATA13 has been identified in consanguineous families with intellectual disabilities (Harripaul et al. 2018), and a genome-wide association analysis of comorbid depressive syndrome and alcohol dependence in human patients identified a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in SPATA13 amongst the top hit SNPs of the study, although only at a p value < 10−5 (Edwards et al. 2012). Because of the brain region-specific expression of Spata13, we were interested in investigating the neurobehavioral functions of Spata13 using a mouse model. To facilitate such behavioural studies we generated a KO mouse of Spata13 using CRISPR-Cas9 to delete the critical exon of isoforms containing the GTPase domain (exon ENSMUSE00000122772). These mice were then subjected to a behavioural test pipeline to investigate five critical behaviour axes: anxiety-like, nociception, working and fear-conditioned memory, social behaviour and circadian activity. From this data we demonstrate that loss of Spata13 leads to deficits in social dominance and a female-specific elevation in home cage activity showing the importance of Spata13 in social hierarchy and a sex-specific effect on voluntary activity.

Materials and methods

Mice

All animal work was performed under the guidance issued by the Medical Research Council and Home Office Project License 30/3206, with local ethical approval. Mice were bred in the Mary Lyon Centre at the MRC Harwell Institute and, when not undergoing phenotyping, were kept in mixed-genotype groups in a 12 h light dark cycle (lights on at 07:00; lights off at 19:00) with ad libitum food and water.

Generation and genotyping of Spata13 KO mice (SPATA13-DEL716-EM1-B6N)

Spata13 KO animals were generated using a CRISPR-Cas9-based gene-targeting method (http://www.informatics.jax.org/allele/key/877470). Briefly, exon ENSMUSE00000122772 of Spata13 was targeted for excision by pronuclear injection of Cas9 mRNA and a cocktail of sgRNAs (TGCGAAACACTTCCCTACTC-TGG, GCCATATAGATTGGTGGCAG-TGG, GCTAGATGCCGGTGTAGGTT-TGG, GGCATCTAGCTTTCATGCCG-TGG) into 1-cell stage C57BL/6NTac embryos. Sequencing of F0 animals revealed an individual with a 716 nt deletion encompassing ENSMUSE00000122772 of Spata13 resulting in a frameshift and premature stop codon in the following exon. Further sequencing of F1 progeny from this founder confirmed inheritance of the mutation. Subsequent genotyping of the colony was carried out by qPCR copy counting with a qPCR-based loss of allele Taqman assay containing primers and a FAM-labelled probe situated within the deleted region of Spata13 (Forward Primer = CAGGGCTGTGGCTGTCTA, Reverse Primer = CTGGACGATGACGGAAACTCA, Probe = TAGTCCCTACCTGGCATTTCCTGA). A Dot1l VIC-labelled internal control was used as a reference assay (Forward Primer = GCCCCAGCACGACCATT, Reverse Primer = TAGTTGGCATCCTTATGCTTCATC, Probe = CCAGCTCTCAAGTCG). Wild type (WT) and homozygous knock out (HOM) Spata13 mice were maintained on a C57BL/6NTac background. There was no evidence of embryonic lethality in this line.

Behavioural testing

All behavioural tests were randomized and performed blind to the experimenter throughout the phenotyping tests. Behavioural testing was performed between 8 to 12 weeks of age with all experiments performed between 13:00 and 17:00 except for the fear-conditioning test performed between 10:00 and 12:00 during the first day of the protocol and between 10:00 and 18:00 during the second day of the protocol. Circadian analysis was performed at 24 weeks of age.

Light dark box

A 40 cm × 40 cm × 40 cm plastic box, equally divided into dark (0 lux) and light (100 lux) compartments, was used to assess anxiety-like behaviour. The mice were placed inside the dark compartment and were able to explore both compartments through a 3 cm × 3 cm door over a 5 min period. The time spent in each compartment, the number of entries and the latency to the first entry in the light compartment were measured via video tracking using EthoVision XT software (Noldus, Wageningen, The Netherlands).

Marble burying

The marble burying test consists of assessing how many marbles are buried by test subjects at the end of a 15-min test period. This is designed to indicate compulsive-like behaviour in mice. The mouse is placed inside a standard cage filled with the equivalent of three-cages of sawdust bedding, where 9 marbles have been placed on the bedding. After 15 min the number of unburied marbles is counted.

Mechanical sensitivity (von Frey filament test)

Mechanical sensitivity was assessed by measuring the minimum force needed to induce a hind limb withdrawal response to a mechanical stimulus induced by calibrated monofilament applied under the foot pad. The mice were habituated to the experimental condition for 1 h on 2 days followed by testing on the third day. Mechanical stimuli were applied under the right and left foot pad of the hind limb using calibrated monofilament from 0.008 to 10 g (Touch Test™ Sensory Evaluator, Stoelting Europe, Ireland). The lowest force to induce 100% withdrawal response based on five stimuli per force was considered as the withdrawal threshold force expressed in grams (g).

Thermal sensitivity

Thermal sensitivity was assessed using the hot plate test. Mice were placed on the hot plate (Bioseb, Chaville, France), set at 50 °C, until the first paw licking is observed. Mice were then immediately returned to their home cage. The latency to the first paw licking, expressed in seconds was considered as the withdrawal latency.

Y maze test

The Y maze test enables the assessment of working memory using an elevated, three-arm, Y maze with a room light at 100 lux. The habituation phase consists of placing the mouse for 10 min in the start arm of the Y maze and allowing the mouse to explore two of the arms (starting and familiar arms) while the novel arm is blocked by a temporary black Plexiglas door. The mouse is then returned to its home-cage for 2 min and the temporary door is removed. The mouse is placed back in the start arm of maze and can explore freely all three arms (start, familiar and novel arms) over 5 min. The time spent and number of entries in each arm is recorded and measured using EthoVision XT. The arms corresponding to the start and familiar arms were alternated between mouse trials. Only female mice were used in this test for practical reasons related to the timing schedule of mouse experiments.

Fear conditioning

Pavlovian threat conditioning was assessed using the Fear Conditioning System (Ugo Basile, Italy). Conditioning phase: mice are placed in a square chamber with an electric grid on the floor for 10 min. During this period, mice are exposed to a series of three conditioned stimuli (5 s tone) each coupled with a 0.5 s footshock stimulus (0.5 mA) at 150 s, 305.5 s and 461 s. Mice are then returned to their home-cage. Context phase: 24 h after conditioning, mice are placed in the same chamber and freezing behaviour recorded for 5 min in the absence of any stimuli. Mice are then returned to their home-cage. Cue phase: 4 h after the context phase, mice are placed in a round Plexiglas cylinder with vanilla fragrance spread at the top of the cylinder for 6 min during which the mouse is exposed to the same sound as in the conditioning phase. The percentage of freezing is measured using the ANYMaze video tracking system (Stoelting Europe).

Social dominance

The social dominance tube test enables the assessment of the dominant/subordinate relationship between a pair of mice from different cages, and with similar age and weight (body weight curves up to 16 weeks available at www.mousephenotype.org). One WT and one HOM mouse are allowed to enter at opposite ends of a transparent polyvinyl chloride tube, 30 cm long and 4 cm diameter. After the mice meet at the centre of the tube, the first mouse to reverse out of the tube is considered the subordinate. Each mouse performed between 2 to 7 challenges (average of 5 challenges) against a different mouse and the percentage of challenges won was recorded.

Circadian activity

Mice were analysed for circadian activity using the COMPASS system as described by Brown et al. 2017. Mice were individually housed under a passive infrared sensor and movement within the passive infrared field recorded in 10 s bins. Data was captured for 5 days in a 12:12 LD cycle, followed by 9 days in constant darkness. Circadian analysis was performed using custom Python scripts and excel sheets to convert activity data into AWD files for analysis on Clocklab (Actimetrics, Illinois) or Actiwatch Sleep analysis software (CamNtech, Cambridge).

Golgi labelling and spine counts

Golgi-Cox neuronal staining was performed using the FD Rapid GolgiStain Kit (FD NeuroTechnologies Inc, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. 120 µm sections of the cortex were taken using a vibratome, mounted upon charged slides, cleared in Histo-Clear (National Diagnostics, UK) and coverslipped. Neurons were viewed on a Zeiss Axio-Observer Z1 microscope and spine counts taken from at least 25 neurites per animal (n = 4 per genotype).

Statistical analysis

GraphPad Prism 8 was used to perform the statistical analysis. For the behavioural tests, genotype and sex effects 2-way or repeated measures 2-way ANOVA were used followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison tests. The Mann–Whitney test was used to analyse the marble-burying test data. Repeated measures 2-way ANOVA was used for analysing activity over time in the circadian analysis. Repeated measures one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons tests was used to analyse the spontaneous alternation Y maze data. Welch’s t test was used to compare the genotype of each sex group in the social dominance test data. For the Golgi staining data, Welch’s t test was used to compare the spine counts per µm between genotypes in female prefrontal cortex.

Results

Loss of Spata13 does not affect memory, anxiety, nociception or spine counts

Cohorts of Spata13 homozygous knockout animals and wildtype controls were behaviourally assessed using the light–dark box (anxiety and exploratory behaviour), marble burying (stereotypical compulsive behaviour), von Frey filament test (mechanical sensitivity), hot plate (thermal sensitivity), working memory (forced alternation y-maze) and fear conditioning (cued and contextual memory). Analysis of the data produced in these tests found no effect of genotype in any of the parameters analysed, suggesting that loss of Spata13 did not result in gross changes in these behaviours (Table 1). Additionally, the loss of Spata13 did not affect the number of spines per µm in the prefrontal cortex (Welch’s t test, p = 0.9667, n = 4 for each genotype), (Fig. 1).

Table 1.

Behavioural measures in Spata13 mice

Phenotyping test Parameter measured Statistical analysis Significance of genotype effect
Light–dark box Time in light 2-way ANOVA (genotype X sex) 0.3153
No. of entries into light 2-way ANOVA (genotype X sex) 0.0676
Marble burying Number of marbles buried by female mice Mann–Whitney U test 0.7827
Number of marbles buried by male mice Mann–Whitney U test 0.8885
Mechanical sensitivity Force to induce foot withdrawal in females 2-way ANOVA (genotype X paw) 0.721
Force to induce foot withdrawal in males 2-way ANOVA (genotype X paw) 0.2156
Thermal sensitivity Latency to first paw lick 2-way ANOVA (genotype X sex) 0.8203
Forced alternation y-maze Time spent in each arm 1-way ANOVA WT: f = 0.4538, p = 0.6210; Hom: f = 1.181, p = 0.3455
Number of entries into novel arm 1-way ANOVA WT: f = 20.04, p = 0.0003; Hom: f = 17.79, p = 0.0005
Fear conditioning Contextual freezing in females 2-way ANOVA (genotype X test phase) 0.2172
Contextual freezing in males 2-way ANOVA (genotype X test phase) 0.4395
Cued freezing in females 2-way ANOVA (genotype X test phase) 0.5819
Cued freezing in males 2-way ANOVA (genotype X test phase) 0.7321
Open in a new tab

No significant differences from wild-type were observed in parameters measuring anxiety, memory and nociception

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Spine counts in female prefrontal cortex. Spine counts per µm of prefrontal cortex slices do not show differences between female WT and HOM Spata13 mice

Spata13 knockout animals show increased levels of subordinate behaviour

The social dominance tube test reveals the dominant and subordinate mouse amongst random test pairs. Both WT female (Welch’s t test, *p = 0.0135, n = 6–7) and WT male (Welch’s t test, **p = 0.0021, n = 6) show a significantly higher percentage of challenges won compared to the HOM of the same sex indicating that mutants are significantly more subordinate in such pairings (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Spata13 KO mice are subordinate to the dominant WT mice. Assessment of dominant/subordinate status using the social dominance tube test shows that female and male WT mice won more challenges when paired against HOM Spata13 mice. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01

Female SPATA13 knockout mice show increased activity in the dark phase of the LD cycle

Cohorts of both sexes of mice (n = 8 wildtype and homozygous) were analysed for changes in home cage activity and circadian rhythms using passive infrared screening. Data capture was performed for 5 days in a 12:12 light–dark cycle followed by 9 days in constant darkness. Following data analysis we found no significant differences between genotypes in any of the circadian parameters analysed (Table 2).

Table 2.

Circadian parameters in Spata13 homozygous mice

Parameter Lighting conditions Male Female
Wildtype Homozygote p Wildtype Homozygote p
Period (h) Constant darkness 23.96 ± 0.01 23.89 ± 0.04 0.116 23.84 ± 0.03 23.81 ± 0.04 0.551
Amplitude Light–dark 394.33 ± 44 452 ± 48 0.396 749.62 ± 93 984.25 ± 132 0.171
Amplitude Constant darkness 269.1 ± 50 376.5 ± 50 0.258 1020 ± 125 1045.6 ± 184 0.91
Length of active phase (h) Light–dark 12.76 ± 0.21 13.03 ± 0.19 0.361 12.98 ± 0.28 12.8 ± 0.56 0.78
Length of active phase (h) Constant darkness 13.45 ± 0.26 13.98 ± 0.43 0.306 13.83 ± 0.3 13.49 ± 0.66 0.652
Interdaily stability Light–dark 0.558 ± 0.02 0.562 ± 0.21 0.923 0.704 ± 0.02 0.724 ± 0.02 0.577
Interdaily stability Constant darkness 0.407 ± 0.03 0.422 ± 0.02 0.701 0.551 ± 0.09 0.528 ± 0.12 0.629
Intradaily Variability Light–dark 1.52 ± 0.08 1.55 ± 0.07 0.822 1 ± 0.09 1.05 ± 0.12 0.701
Intradaily Variability Constant darkness 1.73 ± 0.09 1.72 ± 0.08 0.953 1.21 ± 0.1 1.2 ± 0.09 0.954
Open in a new tab

No significant differences between genotypes were found in any of the circadian parameters analysed in either sex

Activity over the 24-h cycle was analysed in 30-min bins for the female (Fig. 3) and male (Fig. 4) WT and HOM cohorts. This revealed that (Fig. 3a) female HOM Spata13 mice show a significant elevation in activity in the first seven hours of the dark phase of the light–dark cycle compared to wildtype littermates (Female: repeated measures 2-way ANOVA, Interaction, p = 0.0002; Genotype difference, p = 0.2191; Time difference, p < 0.0001; Subject, p = 0.0104; n = 8). Further analysis of animal activity demonstrated that this elevation of activity was not present when animals are housed under conditions of constant darkness (Fig. 3b) (Female: repeated measures 2-way ANOVA, Interaction, p = 0.44; Genotype difference, p = 0.9143; Time difference, p < 0.0001; Subject, p = <0.0001; n = 8). We found no significant differences in the activity cycles of male animals (Fig. 4a). Male activity in light–dark: repeated measures 2-way ANOVA, Interaction, p = 0.3156; Genotype difference, p = 0.9572; Time difference, p < 0.0001; Subject, p = <0.0001; n = 8 (Fig. 4b). Male activity in constant darkness: repeated measures 2-way ANOVA, Interaction, p = 0.2474; Genotype difference, p = 0.8769; Time difference, p < 0.0001; Subject, p = <0.0001; n = 8).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

Home-cage activity in Spata13 females. Analysis of home-cage activity over time in female animals shows that Spata13 knockout animals show elevated activity levels in the dark phase of the light–dark cycle (a). No observable differences in activity were observed in female animals upon their release into constant darkness (b)

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

Home cage activity in Spata13 males. Analysis of home-cage activity over time in male animals shows that Spata13 knockout animals show no differences in activity levels in either the light–dark cycle (a) or upon release into constant darkness (b)

Discussion

SPATA13 is a Rho-family GEF expressed in specific brain regions such as the extended amygdala (Becker et al. 2008). Within the brain Spata13 can modulate glutamatergic dendritic spine formation (Evans et al. 2015) and evidence from human patients suggests that the gene is associated with intellectual disability (Harripaul et al. 2018). These lines of evidence suggest that Spata13 may play important roles in brain function and output and, given that behavioural data associated with the gene is lacking at present, we performed a detailed behavioural analysis of the Spata13 knockout mouse line. Our data demonstrates that Spata13 is implicated in social behaviour in mice of both sexes and involved in dark phase voluntary locomotion in female mice. Other behavioural aspects such as fear conditioning, anxiety-like behaviour, working memory, and thermal and mechanical sensitivity were not affected by the KO of Spata13 despite the gene’s enriched expression in the central extended amygdala. Likewise, screening mutant cohorts in the International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium phenotyping pipeline (IMPC, www.mousephenotype.org) failed to identify parameters that were significantly affected.

A recent study combining microarray and exome sequencing of patients with non-syndromic intellectual disability (ID) identified a missense mutation in SPATA13 in 16 patient families (Harripaul et al. 2018). While the potential mechanism by which this mutation may modulate the development of intellectual disability is unknown, it is notable that SPATA13 has been demonstrated to affect dendritic spine formation (Evans et al. 2015) and that altered spine dynamics have been associated with ID and related symptoms (Belichenko et al. 1994). However, in the present study, we found no impairments in working memory, conditioned memory or spine numbers in the prefrontal cortex in Spata13 knockout animals. This discrepancy is most likely due to the fact that the human missense mutations may have different consequences on gene function (such as dominant negative or expression effects) than the knockout mouse line presented here. In addition, functional redundancy may also mitigate some of the phenotypes otherwise presented by the knock out. SPATA13 is a Rho family GEF which activates the small GTPases Rac, CDC42 and Rho (Kawasaki et al. 2007; Bristow et al. 2009). While GEFs play important cellular functions through the regulation of small GTPases and G proteins (Bos et al. 2007; Stanley and Thomas 2016), there are known to be at least 80 RhoGEF proteins in the human genome (Rossman et al. 2005; Goicoechea et al. 2014). It is, therefore, distinctly possible that other members of the GEF family may be able to compensate for the loss of SPATA13 in these animals.

Our data do demonstrate that Spata13 knockout mice show subordinate behaviour when challenged by wildtype mice. Some of the neuronal networks underpinning social hierarchy are glutamatergic pathways of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), which have been demonstrated to be modulated by RAS and RAP GTPases (Wang et al. 2014). Although it is not yet known whether SPATA13 functions as a GEF for RAS, a potential mechanism through which SPATA13 function may underpin social behaviours is through a reduction of RAS GTPase activation in these glutamatergic synapses. Indeed, not only is Spata13 involved in glutamatergic dendrite spine development (Evans et al. 2015), it is also expressed in the frontal cortex of prenatal human brain (Miller et al. 2014) suggesting a possible role in the development of these glutamatergic connections. While we did not see a difference in the prefrontal cortex spine counts, the glutamatergic synapse quantity and function have not been studied. Further investigations are necessary to determine the specific function of SPATA13 within this prefrontal network and how this modulates social function.

Additionally, our study shows that female Spata13 knockout mice have an increase in activity during the first 7 h of the active (dark) phase. Notably, the central amygdala in female rats is involved in voluntary activity during the dark phase and this control has been suggested to be modulated by ovarian hormones (Izumo et al. 2012). Chromatin immunoprecipitation has shown that estradiol recruits the estrogen receptors ERα to SPATA13 (Levy et al. 2008). While the mechanisms underlying the increase of locomotor activity of the female Spata13 knockout mice cannot be explained here, further studies would be of merit to understand whether the link between SPATA13 and the oestrogen system inside the central amygdala could explain the observed alterations in activity. It is also interesting to note that we did not observe any hyperactivity in the behavioural tests presented here, all of which were performed during the light phase. It would, therefore, be worth further testing the female mice for hyperactivity during the dark phase and whether this is associated with any additional behavioural anomalies.

Conclusion

Here, we have shown that knocking out Spata13 has no effect on viable embryonic development, circadian rhythms, learning and fear conditioning and anxiety-like behaviour. However, Spata13 is involved in the mechanism of social hierarchy in both female and male mice, and in nocturnal activity in female mice.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the staff of the Mary Lyon Centre for the maintenance and welfare of mouse lines and the Molecular and Cellular Biology group for generating Spata13 KO mice. This work was supported by the Medical Research Council (Grant Code MC_U142684173).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. Becker JAJ, Befort K, Blad C, et al. Transcriptome analysis identifies genes with enriched expression in the mouse central extended amygdala. Neuroscience. 2008;156:950–965. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.07.070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Belichenko PV, Oldfors A, Hagberg B, et al. Rett syndrome: 3-D confocal microscopy of cortical pyramidal dendrites and afferents. NeuroReport. 1994;5:1509–1513. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199407000-00025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bos JL, Rehmann H, Wittinghofer A. GEFs and GAPs: critical elements in the control of small G proteins. Cell. 2007;129:865–877. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bourbia N, Ansah OB, Pertovaara A. Corticotropin-releasing factor in the rat amygdala differentially influences sensory-discriminative and emotional-like pain response in peripheral neuropathy. J Pain. 2010;11:1461–1471. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bristow JM, Sellers MH, Majumdar D, et al. The Rho-family GEF Asef2 activates Rac to modulate adhesion and actin dynamics and thereby regulate cell migration. J Cell Sci. 2009;122:4535–4546. doi: 10.1242/jcs.053728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown LA, Hasan S, Foster RG, Peirson SN. COMPASS: continuous open mouse phenotyping of activity and sleep status. Wellcome Open Res. 2017;1:2. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.9892.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Douglass AM, Kucukdereli H, Ponserre M, et al. Central amygdala circuits modulate food consumption through a positive-valence mechanism. Nat Neurosci. 2017;20:1384–1394. doi: 10.1038/nn.4623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Edwards AC, Aliev F, Bierut LJ, et al. Genome-wide association study of comorbid depressive syndrome and alcohol dependence. Psychiatr Genet. 2012;22:31–41. doi: 10.1097/YPG.0b013e32834acd07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Evans JC, Hines KM, Forsythe JG, et al. Phosphorylation of serine 106 in Asef2 regulates cell migration and adhesion turnover. J Proteome Res. 2014;13:3303–3313. doi: 10.1021/pr5001384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Evans JC, Robinson CM, Shi M, Webb DJ. The guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) Asef2 promotes dendritic spine formation via rac activation and spinophilin-dependent targeting. J Biol Chem. 2015;290:10295–10308. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.605543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fox AS, Shackman AJ. The central extended amygdala in fear and anxiety: closing the gap between mechanistic and neuroimaging research. Neurosci Lett. 2017 doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.11.056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Goicoechea SM, Awadia S, Garcia-Mata R. I’m coming to GEF you: regulation of RhoGEFs during cell migration. Cell Adhes Migr. 2014;8:535–549. doi: 10.4161/cam.28721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Haller J. The role of central and medial amygdala in normal and abnormal aggression: a review of classical approaches. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018;85:34–43. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Harripaul R, Vasli N, Mikhailov A, et al. Mapping autosomal recessive intellectual disability: combined microarray and exome sequencing identifies 26 novel candidate genes in 192 consanguineous families. Mol Psychiatry. 2018;23:973–984. doi: 10.1038/mp.2017.60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Izumo N, Ishibashi Y, Ohba M, et al. Decreased voluntary activity and amygdala levels of serotonin and dopamine in ovariectomized rats. Behav Brain Res. 2012;227:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.10.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kawasaki Y, Sagara M, Shibata Y, et al. Identification and characterization of Asef2, a guanine–nucleotide exchange factor specific for Rac1 and Cdc42. Oncogene. 2007;26:7620–7627. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kawasaki Y, Tsuji S, Muroya K, et al. The adenomatous polyposis coli-associated exchange factors Asef and Asef2 are required for adenoma formation in Apc(Min/+)mice. EMBO Rep. 2009;10:1355–1362. doi: 10.1038/embor.2009.233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Koob GF. The role of the striatopallidal and extended amygdala systems in drug addiction. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;877:445–460. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09282.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lein ES, Hawrylycz MJ, Ao N, et al. Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain. Nature. 2007;445:168–176. doi: 10.1038/nature05453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Levy N, Tatomer D, Herber CB, et al. Differential regulation of native estrogen receptor-regulatory elements by estradiol, tamoxifen, and raloxifene. Mol Endocrinol. 2008;22:287–303. doi: 10.1210/me.2007-0340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Miller JA, Ding S-L, Sunkin SM, et al. Transcriptional landscape of the prenatal human brain. Nature. 2014;508:199–206. doi: 10.1038/nature13185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rossman KL, Der CJ, Sondek J. GEF means go: turning on RHO GTPases with guanine nucleotide-exchange factors. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6:167–180. doi: 10.1038/nrm1587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sagara M, Kawasaki Y, Iemura S, et al. Asef2 and Neurabin2 cooperatively regulate actin cytoskeletal organization and are involved in HGF-induced cell migration. Oncogene. 2009;28:1357–1365. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Shackman AJ, Fox AS. Contributions of the central extended amygdala to fear and anxiety. J Neurosci. 2016;36:8050–8063. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0982-16.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Stanley RJ, Thomas GMH. Activation of G proteins by guanine nucleotide exchange factors relies on GTPase activity. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0151861. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang F, Kessels HW, Hu H. The mouse that roared: neural mechanisms of social hierarchy. Trends Neurosci. 2014;37:674–682. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2014.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Waraczynski MA. The central extended amygdala network as a proposed circuit underlying reward valuation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006;30:472–496. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mammalian Genome are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES