Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 30;9:6711. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43160-3

Table 1.

The eight different ways in which TLR2 genotype was modelled are shown.

Name Type of variable # of genotypes Identity of genotypes # of alleles Identity of alleles
Geno1 Categorical 6 C1C1, C2C2, C3C3, C1C2, C1C3, C2C3 NA NA
Geno2 Categorical 3 C2C2, C2Cx, CxCx; (Cx = C1 = C3) NA NA
Geno3 Categorical 3 C1C1, C1Cy, CyCy; (Cy = C2 = C3) NA NA
Geno4 Categorical 3 C3C3, C2Cz, CzCz; (Cz = C1 = C2) NA NA
Geno5 1 Covariate NA NA 2 # of C2 alleles; (C1 = C3)
Geno6 1 Covariate NA NA 2 # of C1 alleles; (C2 = C3)
Geno7 1 Covariate NA NA 2 # of C3 alleles; (C1 = C2)
Geno8 3 Covariates NA NA 3 # of C1, C2, and C3 alleles

TLR2 genotype was either modelled as a categorical factor where each TLR2 genotype was a different category or as a covariate that counted the number of TLR2 alleles. We reduced the number of genotypes or alleles by setting pairs of alleles or genotypes as equivalent. For example, for Geno2, we assumed that the C1 and C3 alleles are equivalent so that there are only 3 distinct genotypes: C2C2, C2Cx, CxCx, where Cx = C1 = C3. Combining similar genotypes (or alleles) increases the sample size for the remaining genotype categories and thereby increases the power of the statistical test.