Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 26;31(5):661–671. doi: 10.1007/s40520-018-1015-9

Table 4.

Baseline, adjusted mean change and between-group comparison for health-related quality of life

Intervention (HIT; n = 18) Control (CON; n = 18) Group comparison (HIT–CON)
Baseline (mean ± SD) Adjusted mean changea; 90% CI Baseline (mean ± SD) Adjusted mean changea; 90% CI Between group difference; 90% CI Qualitative inference
Physical functioning 53.2 ± 3.6 0.4; − 0.9 to 1.7 53.5 ± 4.0 0.6; − 0.5 to 1.7 − 0.2; − 1.8 to 1.5 Likely trivial
Role-physical 50.0 ± 5.8 3.7; 1.4 to 6.1 51.2 ± 4.9 0.8; − 1.6 to 3.1 3.0; − 0.4 to 6.3 Possibly small beneficial
Bodily pain 52.9 ± 8.3 3.1; − 0.5 to 6.8 54.3 ± 5.9 − 1.1; − 3.4 to 1.1 4.3; 0.0 to 8.5 Likely small beneficial
General health 53.0 ± 7.6 2.0; − 0.4 to 4.5 56.4 ± 6.6 − 1.3; 1.0 to 2.3 3.3; 0.0 to 6.6 Possibly small beneficial
Vitality 55.1 ± 7.4 2.7; − 0.2 to 5.5 54.9 ± 4.9 − 0.5; − 3.4 to 2.3 3.2; − 0.8 to 7.2 Possibly small beneficial
Social functioning 53.7 ± 6.6 − 0.4; − 2.8 to 2.1 55.4 ± 5.2 0.3; − 1.9 to 2.5 − 0.7; − 3.9 to 2.5 Possibly trivial
Role-emotional 55.8 ± 1.1 1.1; − 1.5 to 3.8 54.0 ± 3.6 − 3.8; − 6.5 to 1.2 4.9; 1.1 to 8.8 Possibly moderate beneficial
Mental health 53.0 ± 6.2 2.9; 0.7 to 5.0 53.6 ± 7.1 − 0.1; − 2.3 to 2.1 2.9; − 0.1 to 6.0 Possibly small beneficial

Data are presented as norm-based scores (NBS)

HIT high-intensity interval training, CON no-exercise control group, CI confidence interval

aAnalysis adjusted for age, sex and baseline value