Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 6;38(7):1103–1119. doi: 10.1002/sim.8022

Table 2.

Optimal allocation matrices for cohort designs with D = 2. The optimal allocation matrices in the case I={6}, C={C6}={10}, M=M10,6={10}, and σ 2 = 1, with w = 0 and β = 1 are shown for a range of possible combinations of ρ 0, ρ 1, and ρ 2. Restrictions are placed on X such that Equation (1) is identifiable and that each cluster must start in the control intervention (arm 0) and conclude in the experimental intervention (arm 1). Each allocation matrix was identified via our exhaustive search method

Factor Results
ρ 0 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050
ρ 1 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.002
ρ 2 0.250 0.500 0.250 0.500
X
000001000001000001000001000011000111001111011111011111011111
000001000001000001000011000111000111001111011111011111011111
000001000001000001000001000011000111001111011111011111011111
000001000001000001000011000111000111001111011111011111011111
pth
(0.30,0.08,0.08,0.08,0.30) (0.24,0.10,0.10,0.10,0.24) (0.29,0.08,0.08,0.08,0.29) (0.24,0.10,0.10,0.10,0.24)
pemp
(0.4,0.1,0.1,0.1,0.3) (0.3,0.1,0.2,0.1,0.3) (0.4,0.1,0.1,0.1,0.3) (0.3,0.1,0.2,0.1,0.3)
ρ 0 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100
ρ 1 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.002
ρ 2 0.250 0.500 0.250 0.500
X
000001000001000001000001000011001111011111011111011111011111
000001000001000001000011000111000111001111011111011111011111
000001000001000001000001000011001111011111011111011111011111
000001000001000001000011000111000111001111011111011111011111
pth
(0.32,0.07,0.07,0.07,0.32) (0.26,0.10,0.10,0.10,0.26) (0.31,0.07,0.07,0.07,0.31) (0.26,0.10,0.10,0.10,0.26)
pemp
(0.4,0.1,0,0.1,0.4) (0.3,0.1,0.2,0.1,0.3) (0.4,0.1,0,0.1,0.4) (0.3,0.1,0.2,0.1,0.3)