Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2018 May 12;178:583–601. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.026

Fig. 2.A.

Fig. 2.A.

The reconstructed MWF-maps (right panel) are compared for competing processing approaches, namely: the PM approach, our 2D multi-slice spatial regularization approach, the current approach for simulated MWF-map (left panel) at different SNR (10000, 500, 200, 100). At high SNR of 10000, MWF-map reconstructed using either of methods were very close to the simulated truth. At lower SNR (200, 100), the Prasloski’s method (PM) led to large intra-structural variabilities. At SNR ≤ 200, the current approach reconstruct more faithfully than our earlier 2D- multi slice approach. Also, notice that MWF-reconstructions using the proposed approach are closer to the simulated truth.