Skurvydas 2006.
Methods | Randomised cross‐over (9 to 10 months between interventions) | |
Participants | N = 20 healthy untrained men, aged 20.4 (SD 1.7) | |
Interventions | CWI (n = 20): Immersion of legs in water at 15°C (SD 1°C) for 15 minutes x 2. 10 minutes between each immersion Passive (n = 20): Seated rest |
|
Outcomes |
Pain
Muscle soreness (0 to 10 points) (follow‐up: 24, 48, 72 hours post exercise) Strength Isometric knee extension (90 degree knee angle, force measuring device, % of baseline) (follow‐up: immediate (4 hours), 24, 48, 72 hours post exercise) Power Counter movement jump (Kistler force plate, height of jump in cm) (follow‐up: immediate (4 hours), 24, 48, 72 hours post exercise) Biomarker Muscle damage (CK, IU/L) (Follow‐up: 24 hours and 48 hours post exercise) |
|
Exercise type / intensity | 100 counter movement jumps from a 0.75 m height | |
Time between completing exercise and initiating intervention | Immediately and at 4, 8, and 24 hours | |
Participants' fitness level | Physically active but did not take part in any formal exercise or sports programme | |
Notes | Data on pain, strength, power and CK were obtained after personal correspondence | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | "The choice of their participation in the first and second experiments was made at random" (pg. 142) |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | No details in manuscript "No" (personal correspondence) |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Participants | High risk | No blinding. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Personnel | High risk | No blinding. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Outcome assessors | High risk | No details in manuscript "No" (personal correspondence) |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No details in manuscript All 20 participants completed each treatment arm and data were available for all 20 participants (personal correspondence) |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | No published protocol available Outcomes and follow‐ups stated in methods Means and SD presented by intervention group for all outcomes, at all follow‐ups |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Exercise protocol well described No details on co‐interventions |