Skip to main content
. 2019 May 1;2019(5):CD012785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012785.pub2

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Prostacyclin compared to control for pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Prostacyclin compared to control for pulmonary arterial hypertension
Patient or population: pulmonary arterial hypertension
 Setting: outpatients
 Intervention: prostacyclin
 Comparison: control (placebo or usual care)
Outcomes Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) № of participants
 (studies) Certainty of evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Risk with control Risk with prostacyclin
Improvement in WHO functional class
Mean follow‐up 16 weeks
Study population OR 2.39
 (1.72 to 3.32) 1066
 (8 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 Moderate1  
116 per 1000 239 per 1000
 (185 to 304)
6MWD
Mean follow‐up 15 weeks
The mean 6MWD was 257 m* MD 19.50 m higher
 (14.82 higher to 24.19 higher) 2283
 (13 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
Low1,2
6MWD in PAH MCID is 41 m
Mortality
Mean follow‐up 15 weeks
Study population OR 0.60
 (0.38 to 0.94) 2554
 (15 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 Moderate1  
39 per 1000 24 per 1000
 (15 to 37)
mPAP
(the higher the mPAP, the worse the pulmonary hypertension)
Mean follow‐up 11 weeks
The mPAP ranged from 56 to 66 mmHg# MD 3.60 mmHg lower
 (4.73 lower to 2.48 lower) 1132
 (8 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
Low1,2
 
PVR
(the higher the PVR, the
 worse the pulmonary hypertension)
Mean follow‐up 11 weeks
The mean PVR ranged from 26 to 29 units/m2# MD 2.81 WU lower
 (3.80 lower to 1.82 lower) 658
 (7 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 Moderate1  
Cardiac index
(the lower the cardiac index,
 the worse the pulmonary
 hypertension)
Mean follow‐up 11 weeks
The mean cardiac Index ranged from 2 to 2.4 L/min/m2# MD 0.31 L/min/m 2 higher
 (0.23 higher to 0.38 higher) 868
 (6 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
Low1,2
 
RAP
(the lower the RAP,
 the worse the pulmonary
 hypertension)
Mean follow‐up 11 weeks
The mean RAP ranged from 8 to 13 mmHg# MD 1.90 mmHg lower
 (2.58 lower to 1.22 lower) 1060
 (6 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 Moderate1 The higher the RAP, the
 worse the pulmonary hypertension
Dyspnoea (lower scores indicates more severe breathlessness)
Mean follow‐up 17 weeks
SMD 0.21 lower
 (0.32 lower to 0.11 lower) 1521
 (8 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
Low1,2
Using an illustrative SD, this converts to a difference of 0.64 units on the Borg scale.
MCID in PAH is 0.9 units
Quality of life
Mean follow‐up 12 weeks
SMD 0.28 better
 (0.04 better to 0.42 better) 271
 (3 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 Moderate1  
Headache+
Mean follow‐up 12 weeks
277 per 1000 529 per 1000
(95% CI 501 to 593)
3.16 (2.62 to 3.80) 2351
(12 RCTs)
⊕⊕⊕⊝
 Moderate2  
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 
 6MWD: six‐minute walk distance; CI: confidence interval; MCID: minimum clinically important difference; MD: mean difference; OR: odds ratio; PAH: pulmonary arterial hypertension; mPAP: mean pulmonary arterial pressure; PVR: pulmonary vascular resistance; RAP: right atrial pressure; RCT: randomised controlled trials; SD: standard deviation; SMD: standardised mean difference; WHO: World Health Organization
GRADE Working Group grades of evidenceHigh certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
 Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
 Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited; the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
 Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

1Downgraded due to the risk of bias with open‐label studies.
 2Downgraded due to imprecision owing to significantly high heterogeneity, although the direction of effect is consistent.
 *based on only one study which published placebo data; all other studies reported a mean difference between groups.
 #based on baseline data; all other studies reported a mean difference between groups.
 +This was chosen as the most commonly experienced adverse event.