Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 30;75(Pt 3):593–599. doi: 10.1107/S2053273319002729

Figure 3.

Figure 3

This an example of a one-boundary tunneled mirrored boundary distance calculation. As with Fig. 1 the 24 reflections are not shown. Both points Inline graphic and Inline graphic are Selling reduced. The image is the three-dimensional, all-negative octant of the three Inline graphic axes, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, and Inline graphic; the reduction is done along the Inline graphic axis, and Inline graphic and Inline graphic are the two scalars that will be interchanged. The points are shown above the Inline graphic/Inline graphic plane, with their projections onto that plane marked with a circled ‘X’. The Euclidean distance from Inline graphic to Inline graphic is shown as a dotted line. Let mp be the mirror point on the boundary going from Inline graphic to Inline graphic via the boundary. Then the shortest distance from Inline graphic to mp to Inline graphic is also shown as a dotted line. The transformed image of mp is mpx. The distance between Inline graphic and mp is the same as the distance between a transformed Inline graphic and mpx. There is a no-cost tunnel from mp to mpx. So the total alternative distance for this case is the distance between Inline graphic and mp plus the distance from mpx to Inline graphic (shown as a dashed line).