Summary of findings for the main comparison. Ear drops (any active treatment) compared with no treatment for ear wax.
Ear drops (any active treatment) compared with no treatment for ear wax | ||||||
Patient or population: adults and children with ear wax requiring removal Settings: primary care Intervention: any active treatment ear drops Comparison: no treatment | ||||||
Outcomes | Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) | Relative effect (95% CI) | No of participants (studies) | Quality of the evidence (GRADE) | Comments | |
Assumed risk | Corresponding risk | |||||
No treatment | Any active treatment | |||||
Proportion of patients (or ears) with complete clearance of ear wax | 5 per 100 | 22 per 100 | RR 4.09, 95% CI 1.00 to 16.80 | 73 participants; 117 ears (1 study) | ⊕⊕⊝⊝ Low1,2 | — |
Adverse effects: discomfort, irritation or pain | This study reported "excellent" patient acceptability of ear drops, reporting no adverse effects of discomfort, irritation or pain in either group. | ⊕⊕⊝⊝ Low1,2 | — | |||
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). CI: confidence interval; RR: risk ratio | ||||||
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence High quality: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect; Moderate quality: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different; Low quality: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited; the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect; Very low quality: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect. |
1Downgraded by one level for imprecision (one study with a large confidence interval).
2Downgraded by one level due to study limitations (unclear risk of bias).