Skip to main content
. 2008 Nov 11;14(4):287–294. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5949.2008.00055.x

Table 3.

Summary of clinical trials evaluating niacin, alone and in combination with other agents

Clinical trial Agent Compared to Study population Clinical outcomes Reference
CDP Niacin Placebo Men with EKG‐documented prior MI 27%↓ in nonfatal reinfarction at 6 years (3) [29, 30]
11%↓ in overall mortality at 15 years (4)
Stockholm Clofibrate + niacin Placebo Patients with prior MI 13%↓ in serum cholesterol [31]
19%↓ in serum triglyceride levels
36%↓ in ischemic heart disease mortality
26%↓ in total mortality
HATS Simvastatin + niacin Placebo Men and women with CAD and low HDL levels ↓ LDL 42% [32]
↑ HDL 26%
90%↓ in cardiovascular events, including stroke
Regression of coronary artery stenosis by angiogram
AFREGS Gemfibrozil, cholestyramine, and niacin (mean dose: 2.5 g) Placebo Military retirees <76 years old with CAD and low HDL levels 20%↓ in total cholesterol [33]
36%↑ in HDL
26%↓ in LDL
50%↓ in triglyceride levels
↓ in coronary artery stenosis by angiography
13.7%↓ in clinical events, and a 2.8%↓ in CVA or TIA specifically (P‐value >0.2)
CLAS Colestipol + niacin Placebo Nonsmoking men ages 40–59 with previous coronary bypass surgery Atherosclerosis regression measured by carotid IMT, which correlated with ↑ HDL levels [57]
ARBITER 2 Simvastatin + ER‐niacin Simvastatin + placebo Patients with CAD and low HDL levels Slowed atherosclerosis progression by 68%, measured by carotid IMT [17]
↑ HDL 21%
ARBITER Simvastatin + ER‐niacin Simvastatin + placebo Same subjects as above ↑ HDL 23% [38]
3 Significant atherosclerosis regression

CDP = Coronary Drug Project; HATS = HDL‐Atherosclerosis Treatment Study; AFREGS = Armed Forces Regression Study; CLAS = Cholesterol Lowering Atherosclerosis Study; ARBITER = Arterial Biology for the Investigation of the Treatment Effects of Reducing Cholesterol.