Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Ther. 2018 Oct 9;50(3):630–645. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2018.10.003

Table 3.

Means and SDs of neutralization task outcomes by condition, and prediction of outcomes by condition and trait mindfulness

Outcome Mindfulness
(SD)
Relaxation
(SD)
Regression Analyses
Predictor B SE B β sr2.
Post-rumination SUDSa 28.21 (21.97) 23.87 (23.01) Condition .727 4.39 .015 .001
FFMQ −.310 .144 −.188* .032
Postneutralization period SUDSa 6.54 (12.85) 4.81 (16.58) Condition −1.20 2.86 .061 .001
FFMQ −.213 0.94 −.171* .028
Post-rumination urgesb 5.65 (3.04) 6.42 (3.24) Condition −.773 .611 −.123 .015
FFMQ −.020 .021 −.094 .008
Postneutralization period urgesb 3.31 (2.91) 5.19 (3.44) Condition −1.96 .603 −.298** .087
FFMQ −.048 .020 −.218* .046
*

= p < .05;

**

= p < .01; sr2 = squared semi-partial correlation coefficient;

a

= Regression analyses reflect prediction of outcome controlling for pre-task SUDS and gender;

b

= Regression analyses reflect prediction of outcome controlling for gender; SUDS = subjective units of distress, range = 0–100; Urges scale range = 0–10; Condition coded 0 = control, 1 = mindfulness; FFMQ = Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire.