Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 8;2018(3):CD012393. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012393.pub2

Summary of findings 2. A boost of inhaled corticosteroids compared to usual care for autumn asthma exacerbations in children.

A boost of inhaled corticosteroids compared to usual care for autumn asthma exacerbations in children
Patient or population: autumn asthma exacerbations in children
Setting: community
 Intervention: a boost of inhaled corticosteroids
 Comparison: usual care
Outcomes Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) № of participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Risk with usual care Risk with a boost of inhaled corticosteroids
Exacerbations
 assessed with: hospital admission or oral corticosteroid requirement asthma stages 2‐4
 follow‐up: 90 days 127 per 1000 111 per 1000
 (44 to 251) OR 0.86
 (0.32 to 2.30) 173
 (1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 MODERATE 1 Absolute effects calculated using control risk of 12.7% from Teach 2015a.
Adverse events
 assessed with: number of children experiencing 1 or more adverse events asthma stage 2‐4
 follow‐up: 17 to 19 weeks 533 per 1000 434 per 1000
 (280 to 603) OR 0.67
 (0.34 to 1.33) 176
 (1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 MODERATE 1  
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 
 CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio; RCT: randomised controlled trial
GRADE Working Group grades of evidenceHigh quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
 Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
 Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
 Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

1Downgraded once for imprecision because few children studied.