Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 27;2015(8):CD011054. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011054.pub2
Date Event Description
14 February 2016 Amended typo's changed, final check up.
15 November 2015 Feedback has been incorporated See Feedback 1
1. Redo the overall analysis ‘use vs non‐use’ based on adjusted effect estimates.
2. Redo the analyses per generation based on standard meta‐analytic techniques using adjusted estimates.
We abandoned therefore the network meta‐analysis as presented in the first version of this review.
Conclusion adapted accordingly.