Cingozbay 2002.
Methods | no washout required because no participant was receiving any medication or dietary restriction 3‐month before and after trial |
|
Participants | 20 men and women with hyperlipidaemia age 31‐53 years BMI 25.9 patients with other causes of peripheral insulin resistance were excluded Fluvastatin 40 mg/day baseline TC : 7.5 mmol/L (290 mg/dL) Fluvastatin 40 mg/day baseline triglycerides: 5.9 mmol/L (523 mg/dL) |
|
Interventions | Fluvastatin 40 mg/day | |
Outcomes | per cent change from baseline at 12 weeks of serum TC and triglycerides | |
Source of Funding | unknown | |
Notes | LDL‐C and HDL‐C lipid data were not included in the efficacy analysis SDs were imputed by the method of Furukawa 2006 |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | High risk | Controlled before and after design |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | Controlled before and after design |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Lipid parameter measurements unlikely influenced by lack of blinding |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) LDL‐cholesterol | Low risk | Lipid parameters were measured in a remote laboratory |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) WDAEs | High risk | No comparison possible |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | No data for LDL‐C |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | LDL‐C outcome was not reported |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Source of funding was not reported |