Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 6;2018(3):CD012282. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012282.pub2

Isaacsohn 2003.

Methods 4‐week run‐in period
12‐week before and after trial
Participants 173 men and women at least 18 years of age primary hypercholesterolaemia
TG ≤ 400 mg/dL (4.52 mmol/L) and LDL‐C levels ≥ pre established levels that were based on the presence or absence of atherosclerotic disease and other risk factors for CHD
exclusion criteria: active liver disease or hepatic dysfunction, impaired renal function
Fluvastatin 40 mg/day baseline TC : 7.01 mmol/L (271 mg/dL)
 Fluvastatin 40 mg/day baseline LDL‐C : 4.78 mmol/L (185 mg/dL)
 Fluvastatin 40 mg/day baseline HDL‐C : 1.27 mmol/L (49 mg/dL)
Fluvastatin 40 mg/day baseline triglycerides: 2.15 mmol/L (190 mg/dL)
Fluvastatin 80 mg/day baseline TC : 6.83 mmol/L (264 mg/dL)
 Fluvastatin 80 mg/day baseline LDL‐C : 4.68 mmol/L (181 mg/dL)
 Fluvastatin 80 mg/day baseline HDL‐C : 1.24 mmol/L (48 mg/dL)
Fluvastatin 80 mg/day baseline triglycerides: 2.01 mmol/L (178 mg/dL)
Interventions Fluvastatin 40 mg/day
Fluvastatin 80 mg/day
Outcomes per cent change from baseline at 4‐12 weeks of serum TC, LDL‐C, HDL‐C, and triglycerides
Source of Funding unknown
Notes SDs were imputed by the method of Furikawa 2006
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk Controlled before and after design
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk Controlled before and after design
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Lipid parameter measurements unlikely influenced by lack of blinding
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 LDL‐cholesterol Low risk Lipid parameters were measured in a remote laboratory
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 WDAEs High risk No comparison possible
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 1.2% participants were not included in the efficacy analysis
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk LDL‐C outcome was reported
Other bias Unclear risk Source of funding was not reported