Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 6;2018(3):CD012282. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012282.pub2

Osamah 1997.

Methods no washout period required because no patient was receiving hypolipidaemic treatment
24‐week before and after trial
Participants 30 men 40‐70 years old 6 mmol/L < plasma TC < 8 mmol/L (232 mg/dL < plasmaTC < 309 mg/dL)
plasma TG < 3 mmol/L (266 mg/dL) with no chronic or metabolic diseases, no acute coronary event
Fluvastatin 40 mg/day baseline TC : 7.675 mmol/L (297 mg/dL)
 Fluvastatin 40 mg/day baseline LDL‐C : 5.295 mmol/L (205 mg/dL)
Fluvastatin 40 mg/day baseline triglycerides: 2.76 mmol/L (244 mg/dL)
Interventions Fluvastatin 40 mg/day
Outcomes per cent change from baseline at 4‐12 weeks of serum TC, LDL‐C, and triglycerides
Source of Funding unknown
Notes 12‐24 week time period was not included in the efficacy analysis
SDs were imputed by the method of Furukawa 2006
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk Controlled before and after design
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk Controlled before and after design
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Lipid parameter measurements unlikely influenced by lack of blinding
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 LDL‐cholesterol Low risk Lipid parameters were measured in a remote laboratory
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 WDAEs High risk No comparison possible
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk 16.7% participants were not included in the efficacy analysis
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk LDL‐C outcome was reported
Other bias Unclear risk Source of funding was not reported