OPAL‐1 2010.
Methods | Randomised, partially blind, active controlled trial | |
Participants | 448 people recruited in the Asian‐Pacific region with documented non‐valvular AF | |
Interventions | Darexaban (30 mg, 60 mg, 120 mg or 240 mg once daily; n = 354) versus dose‐adjusted warfarin (target INR 2.0 to 3.0 in participants less than 70 years and 1.6 to 2.6 in participants 70 years or older) during a predefined period of 12 weeks (n = 94) | |
Outcomes | Primary safety outcome: composite of major or clinically relevant non‐major bleeding Secondary safety outcome: adverse events, liver function tests (ALT and AST) and renal function (serum creatinine) Primary efficacy outcome: composite of stroke, TIA, systemic embolic events and all‐cause death |
|
Notes | Study sponsored by Astellas | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Participants were randomly assigned to treatment groups |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Participants were randomly assigned to treatment groups |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Open‐label administration of both darexaban and warfarin. Different doses of darexaban administered in double‐blind fashion |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Adjudication of outcomes not described |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Outcomes reported in ITT population. Number of participants that discontinued during study and reasons for discontinuation stated |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All predefined outcomes reported for ITT population |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Randomisation into 240 mg darexaban arm terminated early after recommendation from DSMB due to increased bleeding |