Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 16;2018(3):CD011130. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011130.pub3

Summary of findings 1. Summary of findings.

Folic acid compared with calcium lactate for sickle cell (SS) disease
Patient or population: 117 children with homozygous sickle cell (SS) disease
Settings: hospital
Intervention: folic acid 5 mg
Comparison: calcium lactate (placebo)
Outcomes1 Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
(95% CI) No of Participants
(studies) Quality of the evidence
(GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
calcium lactate (placebo) folic acid 5 mg
Folate concentration
Serum folate levels, measured between 6 and 12 months after entry to the study
1. values in excess of 18 pg/L occurring in 6/39 (15%) children in the placebo group.
2. levels below 5 pg/L occurring in 15/39 (39%)
1. values in excess of 18 pg/L occurring in 33/41 (81 %) in
the folic acid group.
2. levels below 5 pg/L None in the folic acid group.
NA 80/115 (70%)
(1 study)
⊕⊕⊝⊝
low2
There were marked differences between trial groups in the distribution of serum folate levels.
Haemoglobin concentration
Haematological analyses were performed in the 100/115 (87%) children in whom baseline (within 2 months of entry to study) and 1 year (between 10 and 14 months after entry)
See comment See comment NA 100/115 (87%)
(1 study)
⊕⊕⊝⊝
low2
There were no significant differences in total haemoglobin (Hb) either at baseline or after 1 year.
Adverse events ‐ acute splenic sequestration
Clinical events experienced by children during the 1 year period commencing at entry to the trial
8/56
Total episodes
15
9/59
Total episodes
12
RR 1.07
(95% CI 0.44 to 2.57)
115
(1 study)
⊕⊕⊝⊝
low2
There were no significant differences in these measures of growth between the folic acid and placebo groups.
Adverse events ‐ painful episodes
Clinical events experienced by children during the 1 year period commencing at entry to the trial
18/56
Total episodes
27
22/59
Total episodes
39
RR
1.16
(95% CI 0.70 to 1.92)
115
(1 study)
⊕⊕⊝⊝
low2
There were no significant differences in painful episodes
between the folic acid and placebo groups.
Adverse events ‐ minor Infections
Clinical events experienced by children during the 1 year period commencing at entry to the trial
48 out of 56 children
Total episodes/child: 2.3
50 out of 59 children
Total episodes/child: 2.7
RR 0.99
(95% CI 0.85 to 1.15)
115
(1 study)
⊕⊕⊝⊝
low2
There were no differences in minor infections
between the folic acid and placebo groups.
Adverse events ‐ major infections
Clinical events experienced by children during the 1 year period commencing at entry to the trial
15 out of 56 children
Total episodes/child: 19
14 out of 59 children
Total episodes/child: 18
RR 0.89
(95% CI 0.47 to 1.66)
115
(1 study)
⊕⊕⊝⊝
low2
There were no differences in major infections
between the folic acid and placebo group.
Adverse events ‐ dactylitis
Clinical events experienced by children during the 1 year period commencing at entry to the trial
17 out of 56 children
Total episodes: 32
12 out of 59 children
Total episodes:15
RR 0.67 (95% CI 0.37 to 1.27) 115
(1 study)
⊕⊕⊝⊝
low2
There were no differences in dactylitis events
between the folic acid and placebo group.
*The basis for the assumed risk is the risk in the control group. The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; RR: risk ratio.
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: we are very uncertain about the estimate.

1. Pre‐specified adverse events of 'Increased incidence of priapism' and 'The risk of masking cobalamin deficiency with consequent neuropsychiatric manifestations (nanogram per litre (ng/L))' were not assessed in the included trial (Rabb 1983). In the included trial, there was no difference between the folic acid and placebo groups for growth, determined by height‐for‐age and weight‐for‐age as well as height and growth velocity.

2. Reason for downgrading evidence to low ‐ very serious risk of bias (two domains of high risk of bias).