Study | Reason for exclusion |
---|---|
Andrews 2014 | Study includes only information about positive results. Investigators did not follow infants who passed the screen once they left the hospital. |
Ewer 2012a | Health Technology Assessment report on already included study |
Hoke 2002 | Case‐control design |
John 2016 | Study includes only information about positive results. |
Kardasevic 2016 | Different population (not asymptomatic newborns) |
Kochilas 2013 | Different outcome (not accuracy) |
Lhost 2014 | Out‐of‐hospital births |
Meberg 2009 | Different outcome (not accuracy) |
Movahedian 2016 | Study includes only information about positive results. |
Narayen 2016a | Out‐of‐hospital births |
Prudhoe 2013 | Study did not include enough information for construction of a 2 × 2 table. Study includes data contained in Richmond 2002 (study included). |
Reich 2003 | Study provides a partial 2 × 2 diagnostic table from which estimation of sensitivity was not possible. |
Reich 2008 | Different outcome (not accuracy) |
Reich 2008a | Different outcome (not accuracy) |
Riede 2009 | Preliminary study |
Ruangritnamchai 2007 | Study includes only information about positive results. |
Saha 2014 | Journal club |
Saxena 2015 | Different population (not asymptomatic newborns) |
Schena 2017 | Different index test (combined pulse oximetry and perfusion index) |
Studer 2014 | Different outcome (not accuracy) |
Taksande 2013 | Study includes only information about positive results. Definition of test positive was not given. |
Tautz 2010 | No ability to determine CCHD outcomes |
Tsao 2016 | Study includes only information about positive results. |
Vaidyanathan 2011 | Study provides a partial 2 × 2 diagnostic table. No ability to determine CCHD outcomes |
Valmari 2006 | Case report |
Walsh 2011 | Different outcome (not accuracy) |
CCHD: critical congenital heart defect.