Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 2;2018(3):CD011893. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011893.pub2

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Systemic administration of beta‐blockers compared to placebo or no treatment for prevention of retinopathy of prematurity in preterm infants.

Systemic administration of beta‐blockers compared to placebo or no treatment for prevention of retinopathy of prematurity in preterm infants
Patient or population: Prevention of retinopathy of prematurity in preterm infants
 Setting: Neonatal clinical care units
 Intervention: Systemic beta‐blockers
 Comparison: Placebo or no treatment
Outcomes Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) № of participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Risk with placebo or no treatment Risk with Beta‐blockers
Severe visual impairment or blindness at 6 to 12 months' corrected age N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A None of the studies reported on this outcome.
Rescue treatment with anti‐VEGF agents 86 per 1000 27 per 1000
 (10 to 74) RR 0.32
 (0.12 to 0.86) 366
 (3 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 LOW Unblinded studies, incomplete outcome data, imprecision of point estimate, few events.
Treatment with laser photocoagulation or cryotherapy 194 per 1000 105 per 1000
 (62 to 173) RR 0.54
 (0.32 to 0.89) 366
 (3 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 LOW Unblinded studies, incomplete outcome data, imprecision of point estimate.
Progression to stage 2 with plus disease 38 per 1000 9 per 1000
(1 to 81)
RR 0.25
(0.03 to 2.16)
161
(2 RCTs)
⊕⊕⊕⊝
 MODERATE Imprecision of point estimates, few events, 95% CI includes both 1) no effect and 2) appreciable benefit or appreciable harm.
Progression to stage 3 ROP 375 per 1000 225 per 1000
 (139 to 360) RR 0.60
 (0.37 to 0.96) 161
 (2 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 MODERATE Imprecision of point estimate, few events.
Progression to stage 4 or 5 ROP 50 per 1000 6 per 1000
 (1 to 98) RR 0.11
 (0.01 to 1.96) 161
 (2 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 MODERATE Few events, 95% CI includes both 1) no effect and 2) appreciable benefit or appreciable harm.
Arterial hypotension and/or bradycardia requiring treatment 0 per 1000 0 per 1000
 (0 to 0) RR 24.35
 (1.32 to 448.50) 366
 (3 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 LOW Unblinded studies, few events.
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 
 CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio
GRADE Working Group grades of evidenceHigh quality: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
 Moderate quality: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate — the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
 Low quality: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited — the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
 Very low quality: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate — the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect