Methods | Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group multi‐centre study. Number of control centres: not reported. Country/location: not reported. 2 treatment arms: 1 rufinamide, 1 placebo. |
|
Participants | Participants: children aged 4‐16 years with refractory focal seizures. Gender: not reported. Mean age: not reported. Ethnic group: not reported. Median number of focal seizures: not reported. Duration of epilepsy: not reported. Inclusion criteria: children aged 4 to 16 years, with a diagnosis of uncontrolled focal seizures who were taking stable dosage of 1 or 2 concomitant AEDs. Exclusion criteria: not reported. Comorbidity: none. Comedication: ≤ 2 AEDs. Total people randomised 269. 1 participant excluded from analysis. 14 people withdrew from study: rufinamide group 10; placebo group 4. |
|
Interventions | Intervention: rufinamide 45 mg/kg per day. Control: placebo. 2‐phase study: 56‐day baseline/screening phase, and 91‐day treatment phase (14‐day titration phase followed by 77‐day maintenance phase). |
|
Outcomes | Primary outcomes (as stated in the publication):
Secondary outcomes (as stated in the publication):
|
|
Notes | Stated aim of study: "This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety (seizure control and adverse effects) of rufinamide as adjunctive therapy in paediatric patients with inadequately controlled primary focal seizures." Language of publication: English. Commercial funding: yes. Publication status (peer review journal): no. Publication status (journal supplement): no. Publication status (abstract): yes. Supported by Eisai Inc. No conflict of interest. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details of randomisation provided. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information provided. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information available to make judgement. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information available to make judgement. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No reasons reported for exclusion of 1 participant from analysis. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Appeared all expected and prespecified outcomes were reported. |
Other bias | High risk | Sponsored by Eisai Inc., the manufacturer of rufinamide. |