Pettinati 2010 arm A.
Methods | Randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial | |
Participants | 79 depressed people with alcohol dependence (49 men and 30 women; age (mean ± SD): sertraline = 43.9 ± 11.5 years; placebo = 43.4 ± 8.9 years) Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Participants with bipolar disorder were excluded. |
|
Interventions | Drugs:
Psychotherapy: weekly individual CBT Scheduled duration of treatment: 14 weeks Site: University of Pennsylvania Treatment Research Center, USA Setting: outpatients Route of administration: orally Starting dose: 50 mg/day Pattern of dose reduction:
|
|
Outcomes | Depression:
Alcohol dependence:
Dropouts Adverse effects |
|
Notes |
Baseline characteristics of participants Depression:
Alcohol dependence:
Other psychiatric comorbidity: participants with other mental disorders were excluded. Other substance use disorders: participants with substance use disorders were excluded. Other characteristics of study Other pharmacological treatment offered: other pharmacological treatments were not allowed. Funding source: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (grant R01‐AA09544‐10). Pfizer Inc., USA, Pharmaceutical Group provided sertraline and matching placebo. Declaration of interest: the authors declared the grants received. Other information In the original study participants were divided into 4 groups:
In the meta‐analysis, data were analyzed and included in 2 substudies:
Both the substudies (Pettinati 2010 arm A; Pettinati 2010 arm B) were included in the 'Effects of interventions: Antidepressants versus placebo' comparison. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Urn randomization reported. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Urn randomization used to evenly distribute participants across groups using 4 pretreatment variables: gender, regular smoking, HRSD scores at time of randomization, and drinking frequency. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Blinding of participants and key study personnel ensured, and unlikely that the blinding could have been broken. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) objective | Low risk | No information on the blinding of outcome assessors. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) subjective | Unclear risk | No information on the blinding of outcome assessors. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Missing data were imputed using appropriate methods. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All expected outcomes reported. |