Summary of findings 2. Alpha‐blockers compared with placebo for ureteral stones.
Alpha‐blockers compared with placebo for ureteral stones | |||||
Patient or population: adult patients presenting with symptoms of ureteral stone disease Setting: single or multicenter Intervention: alpha‐blocker Comparison: placebo | |||||
Outcomes | No. of participants (studies) Follow‐up | Quality of the evidence (GRADE) | Relative effect (95% CI) | Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) | |
Risk with placebo | Risk difference with alpha‐blockers | ||||
Stone clearance | 5787 (15 RCTs) | ⊕⊕⊕⊝ MODERATEa | RR 1.16 (1.07 to 1.25) | Study population | |
728 per 1000 | 116 more per 1000 (51 more to 182 more) | ||||
Major adverse events | 1650 (10 RCTs) | ⊕⊕⊕⊝ MODERATEb | RR 2.09 (1.13 to 3.86) | Study population | |
26 per 1000 | 29 more per 1000 (3 more to 75 more) | ||||
Stone expulsion time | 3240 (7 RCTs) | ⊕⊕⊝⊝ LOWc,d | ‐ | MD 1.98 lower (3.71 lower to 0.24 lower) | |
Pain episodes | 215 (2 RCTs) | ⊕⊕⊝⊝ LOWc,e | ‐ | MD 0.39 lower (1.07 lower to 0.29 higher) | |
Dose of diclofenac (mg) | 3576 (4 RCTs) | ⊕⊕⊝⊝ LOWd,f | ‐ | MD 126.32 lower (181.73 lower to 70.9 lower) | |
Hospitalisation | 500 (2 RCTs) | ⊕⊕⊕⊝ MODERATEe | RR 0.84 (0.48 to 1.47) | Study population | |
96 per 1000 | 15 fewer per 1000 (50 fewer to 45 more) | ||||
Surgical intervention | 1458 (5 RCTs) | ⊕⊕⊕⊕ HIGH | RR 0.93 (0.70 to 1.24) | Study population | |
127 per 1000 | 9 fewer per 1000 (38 fewer to 30 more) | ||||
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). CI: confidence interval; MD: mean difference; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio. | |||||
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence. High certainty: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect. Moderate certainty: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different. Low certainty: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect. Very low certainty: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect. |
aDowngraded owing to inconsistency (high heterogeneity with I² of 68%).
bDowngraded owing to imprecision (wide confidence interval consistent with negligible to substantial harm).
cDowngraded owing to inconsistency (heterogeneity with I² of 57%).
dDowngraded owing to imprecision (wide confidence interval; wide confidence interval consistent with large to negligible benefit).
eDowngraded owing to imprecision (wide confidence interval consistent with no effect and small benefit).
fDowngraded owing to inconsistency (high heterogeneity with I² of 90%).