Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 5;2018(4):CD008509. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008509.pub3

Han 2006a.

Methods
  • Study design: RCT.

  • Study duration: NS.

  • Follow‐up/Treatment duration: 28 days.

Participants
  • Country: Korea.

  • Setting: NS.

  • Patients with stones < 5 mm that were located in the lower ureter.

  • Number: treatment group: 35; control group: 32.

  • Mean age ± SD, years: NS.

  • Sex, M/F: NS.

  • Exclusion criteria: UTI; hydronephrosis; pregnancy; diabetes; multiple stones; low blood pressure.

Interventions Treatment group
  • Tamsulosin 0.2 mg orally once daily.


Control group
  • Caroverine (a spasmolytic drug): 20 mg orally 3 times daily.


All participants were allowed 30 mg ketorolac IM injections on demand.
Outcomes
  • Stone expulsion rate.

  • Stone expulsion time.

  • Use of analgesics.

Funding sources None stated.
Declarations of interest None stated.
Notes Only English abstract available for judgement.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk No quotes available.
Comment: randomisation stated but no information on method used was available; therefore risk of selection bias was considered to be unclear.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No quotes available. Insufficient information to permit judgement.
Comment: Owing to insufficient information, allocation concealment was considered to have unclear risk of bias.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No quotes available. No blinding described.
Comment: Owing to insufficient information, risk of performance bias was considered to be unclear.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No quotes available. No blinding of outcome assessments described.
Comment: Owing to insufficient information, risk of detection bias was considered to be unclear.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No quotes available.
Comment: Losses to follow‐up were not clearly described; therefore risk of attrition bias was considered to be unclear.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No quotes available.
Comment: Owing to insufficient information to permit judgement, risk of reporting bias was considered to be unclear.
Other bias Unclear risk No quotes available.
Comment: Owing to insufficient information to permit judgement, risk of other sources of bias was considered to be unclear.