Aose 2006.

Methods	Study design: RCT Study grouping: parallel group; no further details provided Exclusions after randomisation: not reported Losses to follow‐up: not reported How missing data were handled: not reported Reported power size calculation? no
Participants	Baseline characteristics Blue‐light filtering IOL group Number of participants: number of people (number of eyes): not reported Sex (number of women/number of men): not reported Age: not reported Non‐blue‐light filtering IOL group 1 Number of participants: number of people (number of eyes): not reported Sex (number of women/number of men): not reported Age: not reported Non‐blue‐light filtering IOL group 2 Number of participants: number of people (number of eyes): not reported Sex (number of women/number of men): not reported Age: not reported Non‐blue‐light filtering IOL group 3 Number of participants: number of people (number of eyes): not reported Sex (number of women/number of men): not reported Age: not reported Inclusion criteria: not reported Exclusion criteria: not reported Comparison of study groups at baseline: not reported
Interventions	Intervention characteristics Blue‐light filtering IOL Type of IOL: YA‐60BB (Hoya) Non‐blue‐light filtering IOL 1 Type of IOL: SA60AT (Alcon) Non‐blue‐light filtering IOL 2 Type of IOL: MA60BM (Alcon) Non‐blue‐light filtering IOL 3 Type of IOL: VA60BB (Hoya)
Outcomes	Refractive error, visual acuity, IOL tilt, IOL decentration, intraocular pressure, corneal endothelial cell loss and aqueous flare at three months postoperatively
Identification	Sponsorship source: Funding sources: none Declaration of interest: none for all authors Country: not reported Setting: not reported Comments: Date study conducted: not reported Trial registration number: not reported Contacting study investigators: study authors not contacted; no additional information used for review Date study conducted: not reported First author's name: M Aose Institution: Ophthalmology, Dokkyo University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan Email: not reported Address: not reported
Notes	ARVO conference abstract
Risk of bias
Bias	Authors' judgement	Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias)	Unclear risk	Judgement comment: not reported how list was generated. Study is described as “randomised” but with no further details
Allocation concealment (selection bias)	Unclear risk	Judgement comment: not reported how allocation administered. Study is described as “randomised” but with no further details
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes	High risk	Judgement comment: no information on masking. We assume that in absence of reporting, participants and personnel were not masked.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes	High risk	Judgement comment: no information on masking. We assume that in absence of reporting, the outcome assessors were not masked.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes	Unclear risk	Judgement comment: follow‐up not reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias)	Unclear risk	Judgement comment: no access to protocol or trials registry entry
Other bias	Low risk	Judgement comment: no other apparent sources of bias