Skip to main content
. 2018 May 31;2018(5):CD003220. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003220.pub3

7. Pulpotomy (MTA) versus pulpotomy (ZOE).

Outcome Time point (months) No. of studies Risk ratio (95% CI)
Clinical failure 6 1 Not estimable*
12 1 Not estimable*
24 1 0.20 (0.03 to 1.59)
Radiological failure 6 1 0.33 (0.01 to 7.81)
12 1 0.20 (0.01 to 3.97)
24 1 0.10 (0.01 to 0.72)
Overall failure 6 1 0.33 (0.01 to 7.81)
12 1 0.20 (0.01 to 3.97)
24 1 0.13 (0.02 to 0.93)
Pain 6 1 Not estimable*
12 1 Not estimable*
24 1 3.00 (0.13 to 70.30)
Pathological radiolucency 6 1 Not estimable*
12 1 Not estimable*
24 1 3.00 (0.13 to 70.30)
Pathological root resorption 6 1 0.33 (0.01 to 7.81)
12 1 0.33 (0.01 to 7.81)
24 1 0.08 (0.00 to 1.30)
Pulp canal obliteration 6 1 Not estimable*
12 1 3.00 (0.13 to 70.30)
24 1 11.0 (0.64 to 188.96)
Physiological root resorption 6 1 Not estimable*
12 1 Not estimable*
24 1 0.20 (0.01 to 3.97)

*due to lack of events

Abbreviations ‐ CI: confidence interval; MTA: mineral trioxide aggregate; ZOE: zinc oxide and eugenol