Skip to main content
. 2018 May 31;2018(5):CD003220. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003220.pub3

17. Pulpotomy (Er:YAG laser) versus pulpotomy (CH).

Outcome Time point (months) No. of studies Risk ratio (95% CI)
Clinical failure 6 1 0.31 (0.01 to 7.48)
12 1 0.94 (0.60 to 14.52)
24 1 0.62 (0.11 to 3.56)
Radiological failure 12 1 0.56 (0.14 to 2.21)
24 1 0.31 (0.11 to 0.90)
Overall failure 12 1 0.56 (0.14 to 2.21)
24 1 0.31 (0.11 to 0.90)
Pain 6, 12 and 24 1 Not estimable*
Soft tissue pathology 6, 12 and 24 1 Not estimable*
Pathological mobility 6, 12 and 24 1 Not estimable*
Pathological radiolucency 12 1 0.31 (0.01 to 7.48)
24 1 0.62 (0.11 to 3.56)
Pathological root resorption 12 1 0.94 (0.60 to 14.52)
24 1 0.62 (0.11 to 3.56)

*due to lack of events

Abbreviations ‐ CI: confidence interval; Er:YAG: erbium:yttrium‐aluminium garnet; CH: calcium hydroxide.