Skip to main content
. 2018 May 31;2018(5):CD003220. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003220.pub3

50. Direct pulp capping (Dycal) versus direct pulp capping (Dentogen).

Outcome Time point (months) No. of studies Risk ratio (95% CI)
Clinical failure 1, 3, 6 1 5.00 (0.26, 98.00)
9 1 7.00 (0.38, 127.32)
12 1 4.00 (0.49, 32.72)
Radiological failure 1, 3, 6 1 5.00 (0.26, 98.00)
9 1 3.00 (0.34, 26.45)
12 1 1.67 (0.46, 6.06)
Pain 1, 3, 6, 9 1 Not estimable*
12 1 3.00 (0.13, 69.52)
Soft tissue pathology 1, 3, 6, 9 1 5.00 (0.26, 98.00)
12 1 2.00 (0.20, 20.33)
Pathologic mobility 1, 3, 6, 9 1 5.00 (0.26, 98.00)
12 1 2.00 (0.20, 20.33)
Pathologic radiolucency 1, 3, 6 1 5.00 (0.26, 98.00)
9 1 3.00 (0.34, 26.45)
12 1 1.33 (0.34, 5.21)
Pathologic root resorption 1, 3, 6 1 5.00 (0.26, 98.00)
9 1 2.00 (0.20, 20.33)
12   1.33 (0.34, 5.21)

*due to lack of events

Abbreviation ‐ CI: confidence interval.