Comparison 17. Enamel matrix derivative (EMD) pulpotomy versus formocresol pulpotomy.

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Clinical failure	2		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	Subtotals only
1.1 6 months	2	100	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.8 [0.23, 2.83]
2 Pain	2		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	Subtotals only
2.1 6 months	2	100	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.4 [0.08, 1.92]
3 Soft tissue pathology	2		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	Subtotals only
3.1 6 months	2	100	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	2.0 [0.19, 21.06]
4 Pathologic mobility	2		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	Subtotals only
4.1 6 months	2	100	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	5.0 [0.26, 96.13]