Rewal 2014.
Methods | RCT, parallel‐arm Teeth randomly assigned Conducted in the Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, India. Operator was an investigator. |
|
Participants | 50 children, 50 teeth, age range 4 to 9 years | |
Interventions |
Group 1:Pulpectomy (ZOE); n = 24 (1 visit)
Group 2:Pulpectomy (Endoflas); n = 26 (1 visit)
|
|
Outcomes | Clinical success (absence of pain, redness, swelling, tenderness on percussion, and sinus or fistula), radiographic success (reduction in the size of interradicular radiolucency or the size remaining the same): evaluation at 3, 6 and 9 months | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to make a clear judgement |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to make a clear judgement |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to make a clear judgement |
Blinding of clinical outcomes assessment | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to make a clear judgement |
Blinding of radiological outcomes assessment | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to make a clear judgement |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No missing data |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to make a clear judgement |