Methods | Sampling frame: advertisements in clinics and newsletter. Data collection: indepth interviews. Data analysis: Phenomenological Analysis. |
|
Stated aim of study | To increase knowledge and understanding of the experience of exercising among people with OA and to determine what they perceive as facilitators and barriers to exercising. | |
Details of participants | Country: Iceland. Sample number: 12. Age: ≥ 50 years. Gender: 44 men; 72 women. SES: not stated. Ethnicity: not stated. Occupation/employment: 6 retired/pensioner; 1 full‐time; 2 part‐time; 3 disability pension/allowance. |
|
Details of exercise programme | Not applicable | |
Notes | ||
Quality appraisal | ||
Questions used to judge the dependability and credibility of studies | Review authors' judgements | |
Were steps taken to increase rigour in sampling? | Yes, several steps were taken. | |
Were steps taken to increase rigour in data collection? | Yes, a fairly thorough attempt was made. | |
Were steps taken to increase rigour in data analysis? | Yes, a fairly thorough attempt was made. | |
Were the findings of the study grounded/supported by data? | Well grounded/supported. | |
What was the breadth and depth of findings? | Good/Fair breadth, but limited depth. | |
To what extent does the study privilege the perspectives and experiences of older people with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip? | A lot. | |
Overall dependability and credibility of findings | Review authors' judgements | |
Dependability of findings | High. | |
Credibility of findings | High. |