Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 17;2018(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2
Methods Randomised controlled trial.
Participants Inclusion criteria: adults aged > 55 years with knee OA, considered to be present if 1 or both knees exhibited grade 2 or higher OA by Kellgren and Lawrence (K/L) criteria. Knee pain was considered to be present if participants reported moderate or greater knee pain in the past month (i.e. a rating of ≥3 on a 5‐point Likert scale) for any of the 5 items of the WOMAC pain scale.
Exclusion criteria: inability to walk without assistance; amputation of either lower extremity; knee or hip replacement; history of stroke, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, uncontrollable hypertension, fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis or other systemic connective tissue disease; lower‐extremity neuropathy; severe cognitive impairment.
Country: US.
Sample number: IG: 82; CG: 80.
Mean age: 69 years.
Progress Plus: 84% women.
Interventions Provider(s): fitness trainer.
Training: yes.
Setting: National Institute for Fitness and Sport and home based.
Content: strength training.
Length/intensity: exercise 3 times a week (twice at a fitness facility, once at home) for 12 weeks, followed by transition to home‐based exercise after 12 months.
Comparator: attention placebo/alternative intervention; range of motion exercises.
Outcomes At 30 months:
  • pain (WOMAC);

  • function (WOMAC);

  • depression (CES‐D).

Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Stratified randomisation scheme allocated participants into 8 groups on the basis of sex and the presence of radiographic evidence of knee OA and knee pain.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk No information provided.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes High risk Participants and providers not blind to treatment allocation.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Low risk Blinded outcome assessor.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Breakdown of attrition by group for each follow‐up period not provided.
Attrition: entire sample: 30% (66/221); IG: 36%; CG: 24%.
Reasons for dropout not reported in full. However, authors described that primary reason was time and travel involved in participating.
ITT analysis.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Selective outcome not apparent.
Other bias Low risk No other bias detected.