Skip to main content
. 2018 May 10;2018(5):CD012069. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012069.pub2

Karabekiroglu 2008.

Methods A retrospective cohort of methylphenidate use for 6 months
Participants Number of participants screened: not stated
Number of participants included: 90
Diagnosis of ADHD: DSM‐IV diagnosis (subtype: not stated)
Age: mean: 9.0, range: 5‐16 years old)
IQ: above 70
Sex: 59 males, 14 females
Methylphenidate‐naïve: 100%
Ethnicity: not stated
Country: Turkey
Comorbidity: conduct disorder (16.7%); tics (23.3%); Tourette syndrome (10.5%); obsessive compulsive disorder (16.3%); pervasive developmental disorder (8.1%); learning disorder (26.7%); depression (9.2%)
Comedication: none
Sociodemographics: not stated
Inclusion criteria:
  1. In a clinical sample

  2. In a period of 6 months, all methylphenidate‐naïve patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, whose parents accepted to participate in the study with an informed consent, were included


Exclusion criteria:
  1. Mental retardation

Interventions Methylphenidate type: immediate release
Methylphenidate dosage: 10‐30 mg/day
Mean methylphenidate dosage: 17.6 (SD 4.95) mg/day
Administration schedule: 2‐3 times/day
Duration of intervention: 6 months
Treatment compliance: not stated
Outcomes Non‐serious adverse events:
Parents completed the Barkley Stimulant Side Effects Rating Scale (BSSERS) at baseline and on the 3rd, 7th, and 15th days of the medication
Notes Sample calculation: not stated
 Ethics approval: not stated
 Funding/vested interest: "This research had a naturalistic design. Therefore, a limited financial support, which was supplied by the authors, was needed."
 Key conclusions of the study authors: authors found significant decrease in appetite, and they suppose that some of the Barkley SES may represent both ADHD symptoms and methylphenidate adverse events
Exclusion of methylphenidate non‐responders/children who have previously experienced adverse events on methylphenidate: all participants were methylphenidate‐naïve
 Supplemental information regarding the IQ of the participants received through personal email correspondence with the authors in June 2016 (Karabekiroglu 2016 [pers comm])