Montiel‐Nava 2002.
Methods | A 6‐week randomised parallel trial with 2 arms:
No placebo or no‐intervention group |
|
Participants | Number of participants screened: not stated Number of participants included: 24 Number randomised to methylphenidate: 12 and parent training: 12 Number followed up in methylphenidate‐arm: not stated Number of withdrawals in methylphenidate‐arm: not stated Diagnosis of ADHD: DSM‐IV (subtype: not stated) Age: mean 7.16 years old (range: 6‐10) IQ: mean: 92.25 (SD 15.64). Sex: total sample: 16 males, 8 females (not stated for the methylphenidate group) Methylphenidate‐naïve: 100% Ethnicity: Marabinos (from Northwestern Venezuela) Country: Venezuela Comorbidity: academic, oppositional and various behavioural problems Comedication: not stated Sociodemographics: not stated Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
|
|
Interventions | Methylphenidate type: not stated Methylphenidate dosage: 10 mg/daily at the start of the titration period Administration schedule: morning and noon Duration of intervention: 6 weeks, including 4 weeks of titration (after randomisation) Treatment compliance: not stated |
|
Outcomes | A checklist of adverse effects were used, telephone interview with parent, once weekly during the 4‐week titration period | |
Notes | Sample calculation: no Ethics approval: not stated Funding/vested interests: not stated Authors' affiliations: not stated Key conclusions of the study authors: to our knowledge this is the first article describing the effectiveness of methylphenidate and parent training in Venezuelan children diagnosed with ADHD. It should be considered as a preliminary study, that supports the thesis of positive effects of psychosocial and psychopharmacological interventions in children with ADHD. There was no difference in the effectiveness of the 2 types of treatment Exclusion of methylphenidate non‐responders/children who have previously experienced adverse events on methylphenidate: no (only inclusion of methylphenidate‐naïve children) Supplemental information regarding ethics approval, funding, type of methylphenidate, number of males and females in the methylphenidate group, and adverse event data were not possible to receive through personal email correspondence with the authors. Emails sent twice without reply |